S.Raja v. the State of T.N.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought withdrawal of withdrawn writ petitions filed under Article 226. The court granted permission for withdrawal and dismissed the petitions accordingly.
What did the court decide?
Writ petitions dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 16.03.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
WP.Nos.18136 and 18137 of 2003
S.Raja ..Petitioner in both WPs
Vs 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9. 2.The Assistant Commissioner [Excise], Salem District. ..Respondents in both WPs Writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the order passed by the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.7522/2003/K2 and Na.Ka.11349/2003/K2 dated 25.06.2003 respectively and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sathish Rajan in both WPs For Respondents : Mr.J.Pothiraj, Spl.GP in both WPs
O R D E R
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw these writ petitions and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
- In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, these Writ Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S. Raja
- respondent
The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Prohibition and Excise Department
- respondent
The Assistant Commissioner [Excise], Salem District
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court