Writ petition seeking quashing of a Government Order affecting retirement benefits was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner. No order as to costs. The bench of Mr. Justice S.M. Subramaniam handled this matter.
None granted; Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 28.02.2018
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.(MD) No.10314 of 2013
V.Balasubramanian ... Petitioner
-vs-
Chennai – 600 009.
Chennai – 600 006. ... Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned G.O.2(D) No.58, School Education (A2) Department, dated 26.12.2007 issued by the first respondent insofar as it does not permit the Petitioner to retire and quash the same and consequently to direct the respondents to allow the Petitioner to retire for the purpose of disbursal of gratuity, special provident fund-cum-gratuity amount, leave salary and pay arrears.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Antony Arul Raj For Respondents : Mr.R.Sethuraman Special Government Pleader
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(P&A)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
2
To
Chennai – 600 009.
vsn
MV:SV-MMS:SAR4:15/03/2018/2P/3C
W.P.(MD) No.10314 of 2013
28.02.2018
V.Balasubramanian
The Secretary to Government, Department of School Education
The Director of Elementary Education
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
