A writ petition filed for regularization of service. The court directed the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation regarding his claim within twelve weeks.
The First Respondent directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 11.11.2017 and pass appropriate orders within twelve weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 12.03.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
W.P.(MD)No.1014 of 2018
R.Chandrasekaran
... Petitioner -Vs-
1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary,
Higher Education Department,
Secretariat, Chennai-9.
2.The Commissioner of Technical Education,
Guindy, Chennai-600 025.
3.The Chief Engineer,
Technical Education Department, Guindy, Chennai-600 025.
4.The Executive Engineer, Technical Education Division, Government College of Engineering Campus, Tirunelveli-7. ...Respondents
PRAYER:Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to regularize the petitioner's service from the date of completion of 10 years of service and grant the consequent benefits both monetary and service by considering the petitioner's representation dated 11.11.2017.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh For Respondents : Mrs.S.Srimathy, Special Government Pleader.
ORDER
The petitioner's case is that he worked as Mazdoor on daily wages basis right from the year 1992 and that even proposals were sent in his favour for regularization of his service on 09.03.2010. His specific contention is that he fulfils the requirements set out in G.O.(Ms)No.22, Personnel and Administrative Reforms (F) Department, dated 28.02.2006. He also given a representation dated 11.11.2017.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2.Therefore, the first respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 11.11.2017 and pass
2
appropriate orders in accordance with law with regard to the petitioner's claim for regularization. Such order shall be passed within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
3.This writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Sd/ Assistant Registrar (Crl side) /True copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To 1.The Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu, Higher Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9.
2.The Commissioner of Technical Education, Guindy, Chennai-600 025.
3.The Chief Engineer, Technical Education Department, Guindy, Chennai-600 025.
4.The Executive Engineer, Technical Education Division, Government College of Engineering Campus, Tirunelveli-7.
+1cc to Mr.S.C.Herold Singh, Advocate, SR.No. 54581 W.P.(MD)No.1014 of 2018
12.03.2018
myr KK/SKN RSK/13.03.2018/SAR-3/2P-6C
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to regularization of service after completing 10 years based on his representation.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
R. Chandrasekaran
State of Tamil Nadu
Commissioner of Technical Education
Chief Engineer
Executive Engineer
G.R. Swaminathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
