M.Jayaraman, S/O.S.Mariappa v. the Principal Secretary to
Case brief
What is this about?
In this writ petition, the petitioner, a retired Village Administrative Officer, challenged the finalisation of his pension proposal because pre-absorption services were excluded. Relying on a prior order, the Court allowed the petition and directed respondents to send a revised proposal.
What did the court decide?
The writ petitioner is allowed; respondents are directed to send revised pension proposals calculating half of the services rendered prior to absorption.