S.Ramadoss, Vs The Director

¶1

IN THE JUDICATE OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶2

DATE : 22.02.2018

¶3

CORUM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH

¶4

and THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU

¶5

W.P.No.971 of 2018

¶6

S. Ramadoss ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Director,
Adi-Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department,
Ezhilagam, Chepauk,
Chennai – 600 005
2. The Chairman,
Tamil Nadu State Level Scrutiny Committee,
Chennai.
3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Social Justice & Human Rights,
Villupuram District,
Villupuram
4. The Assistant Commissioner,
Commercial Taxes Department,
Salem Division,
Salem. ..... Respondents

¶7

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to complete the enquiry process in respect of genuineness of verification of the petitioner's Community Certificate as per G.O.Ms.No.106, Adi-Dravidar and Tribal Welfare (CV-I) Department dated 15.10.2012.

¶8

For Appellant :Mr.C. Sivanesan For Respondent : Ms.Thanga Vadhana Balakrishnan

¶9

AGP

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

ORDER

¶12

(Order of the Court was made by R.SUBBIAH, J.,)

¶13

The present writ petition has been filed directing the second respondent to complete the enquiry process in respect of genuineness of verification of the petitioner's Community Certificate as per G.O.Ms.No.106, Adi-Dravidar and Tribal Welfare (CV-I) Department dated 15.10.2012.

¶14

The main grievance of the petitioner is that the enquiry, with regard to the verification of his community certificate, is pending with the second respondent since 2016. Thus, he sought for a suitable direction to complete the enquiry within a time frame.

¶15

3.Today, when the matter is taken up, the learned Additional Government Pleader submits that the vigilance report has been received in the matter, which is in favour of the petitioner and further informs that the State Level Scrutiny Committee will complete the enquiry within a period of two weeks.

¶16

In view of the aforesaid submission made by the learned Additional Government Pleader, the second respondent/Tamil Nadu State Level Scrutiny Committee is directed to complete the enquiry process in respect of genuineness of verification of the Community Certificate of the petitioner, following the relevant Government Orders on the subject and communicate the decision taken to the petitioner and his employer on or before 15.03.2018.

¶17

With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

-Sd/-

Assistant Registrar

// True Copy //

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

To

¶23

The Director,
Adi-Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department,
Ezhilagam, Chepauk,
Chennai – 600 005
2. The Chairman,
Tamil Nadu State Level Scrutiny Committee,
Chennai.
3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Social Justice & Human Rights,
Villupuram District,
Villupuram
4. The Assistant Commissioner,
Commercial Taxes Department,
Salem Division,
Salem.
•
1 cc to Mr.M.Baskaran, Advocate Sr.No.13518
• 1 cc to The Government Pleader Sr.No.14227
W.P.No.971 of 2018
CO(SKS)
RRI 28/03/2018

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Ramadoss, v. The Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Ramadoss, v. The Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs.Ranjitham Vs Mrs.Uma Vijayakumar

C.Panneerselvam Vs The Revenue Divisional

C.Senthilkumar Vs The Revenue Divisional

The Managing Director Vs Sri.P.R.Rajiv Shankar @

Tmt Meena Gopal Vs Haridoss

P. Arumugham Vs P. Radha