This Court directed the Revenue Divisional Officer to consider the petitioner's application for community certificates for his children, applying Supreme Court guidelines, and to pass appropriate orders within six weeks.
Directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's case and pass appropriate orders within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 21.02.2018 Coram
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice R.Subbiah
and
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.D.Audikesavalu
W.P.No.3862 of 2018
C.Senthil Kumar
...Petitioner
Vs.
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Harur, Dharmapuri District. ...Respondent
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent to issue community certificate to the petitioner's children, viz., 1. S.Harini and 2. S.Lokesh, that, they belong to Kurumans (ST) Community, based upon the community certificate already issued to the petitioner and his brother C.Panneerselvam.
For Petitioner : Mr.S. Doraisamy
For Respondent : Ms.Thanga Vadhana Balakrishnan Government Advocate
O R D E R (Order of the Court was delivered by R.Subbiah,J.)
Heard Mr.S. Doraisamy, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Ms.Thanga Vadhana Balakrishnan, the learned Government Advocate, accepting notice on behalf of the respondent. With the consent of the learned counsel appearing on either side, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal.
Sub Assistant Registrar sd
To
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Harur, Dharmapuri District.
+1 cc to Mr.S.Doraisamy Advocate sr 13322
+1 cc to the Govt Pleader sr 13691
W.P.No.3862 of 2018
aa28/03/2018
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kumari Madhuri Patil and another Vs. Additional CommissionerReferred¶18
Kumari Madhuri Patil and another Vs. Additional Commissioner [(1994) 6 SCC 241] · Who else cites this
C.Senthil Kumar
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Harur, Dharmapuri District
R.Subbiah
P.D.Audikesavalu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
