Dismissed

K.Chinnaiyan, v. The District Collector

Madras HC20 Apr 2018WP/9625/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition for certiorari and quashal regarding land revenue proceedings. The court discharged petitioners from further obligation as they sought permission to withdraw the petition to pursue remedies in a pending civil suit.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to pursue remedy in pending civil suit (OS.No.282/2014) via Interlocutory Application.

K.Chinnaiyan, Vs The District Collector — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 20.04.2018

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN

¶5

AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM

¶7

WP.No.9625/2018 & WMP.No.11545/2018
K.Chinnaiyan .. Petitioner
Versus
1.The District Collector
Villupuram District,
Villupuram.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer
Revenue Department, Gingee
Villupuram District.
3.The Tahsildar
Tindivanam Taluk
Villupuram District.
4.The Executive Officer
Gingee Panchayat
Gingee, Villupuram District.
5.K.Jengal .. Respondents
Prayer:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution
of India praying for issuance of a writ of certiorari calling
for the records pertaining to the proceedings of the 4 th
respondent in Na.Ka.No.A1/4742013 dated 06.04.2018 and quash the
same as illegal, incompetent and ultravires.

¶8

For Petitioners: Mr.M.Guruprasad
For RR 1 to 4 : Mr.R.Udhayakumar, AGP

¶9

ORDER

¶10

[Order of the Court was made by M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J.,]

¶11

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to work out his remedy

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

in the pending suit in OS.No.282/2014 on the file of the Court of Principal District Munsif at Gingee, by filing an application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with section 151 CPC. He has also made an endorsement in the petition to that effect.

¶14

2 The Court heard the submissions of Mr.R.Udhyakumar, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 4.

¶15

3 In the light of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty sought for by the petitioner is granted and the Court of Principal District Munsif at Gingee, on entertainment of the Interlocutory Application for ad-interim injunction, shall accord priority and dispose of the same at an early date. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.

¶16

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)
//True copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
AP
1.The District Collector
Villupuram District,
Villupuram.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer
Revenue Department, Gingee
Villupuram District.
3.The Tahsildar
Tindivanam Taluk
Villupuram District.
4.The Executive Officer
Gingee Panchayat
Gingee, Villupuram District.
5.The Principal District Munsif,
Gingee.
+1cc to Mr.M.Guruprasad, Advocate SR.No.30053
+1cc to Government Pleader SR.No.29961
WP.No.9625/2018
MR(CO)
GN(15/05/2018)

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Chinnaiyan, v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Chinnaiyan, v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

L. Udayakumar Vs The Secretary to Government

P.Marimuthu, Vs The Commissioner

J.Ashok Kumar Vs The Assistant Commissioner

Sheik Ameer, Vs The Secretary

Arumugam Vs The District Collector

R.Palanisamy, Vs The District Collector