Disposed

Micro Labs and Brown and v. The Government of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC13 Jun 2018WP/7796/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the Government of Tamil Nadu to consider a conciliation report submitted by the Assistant Commissioner of Labour, take a decision, and pass appropriate orders within 12 weeks regarding an industrial dispute between Micro Labs and the Employee Union.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Government of Tamil Nadu to consider the conciliation report, take a decision, and pass appropriate orders within 12 weeks.

Micro Labs and Brown and Vs The Government of… — Labour and Industrial Disputes | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 13.06.2018

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶5

W.P.No.7796 of 2018 and W.M.P.No.9710 of 2018

¶6

Micro Labs and Brown and Burk Employee Union Represented by its Secretary Regn No. 503/DRP Plot No.60, SIPCOT Housing Colony SIPCOT, Hosur - 635 126 Krishnagiri District ... Petitioner

¶7

-vs-

¶8

1.The Government of Tamil Nadu Represented by its Secretary Department of Labour and Employment Fort St George - 600 109 Chennai.

¶9

The Assistant Commissioner of Labour/ Labour Officer, Krishnagiri.

¶10

The Management of Micro Labs Limited Represented by its Managing Director No.92, SIPCOT Industrial Complex SIPCOT Phase I, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

¶11

Micro Labs Workers Union & Micro Labs Employees Union Federation Represented by its Secretary No.18, Near KAP Kalyana Mandapam, Kamaraj Colony, II Cross, Hosur, 635126. Krishnagiri District. ... Respondents

¶12

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Krishnagiri to record the conciliation failure with

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

regard to the Industrial Dispute raised by the petitioner union on 16.08.2017 bearing reference No.NA.KA. No. A/503/2017 and forward the report to the 1st respondent Government of Tamil Nadu and further direct the 1st respondent to pass orders with regard to the reference of the above Industrial Dispute under Section 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act with in such stipulated time.

¶15

For Petitioner :: Mr.K.Sudalaikannu For Respondents :: Mr.Elumalai

¶16

Government Advocate for R1 and R2.

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

The relief sought for in this writ petition is to direct the respondent Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Krishnagiri to record the conciliation failure and send a report to the concerned authorities for passing appropriate orders.

¶19

The learned counsel for the writ petitioner now made a representation that the conciliation officer had quashed the proceedings and submitted a report to the Government. Thus, it is for the Government to consider the report and pass appropriate orders in respect of the demands raised by the Registered unions.

¶20

In this regard, the first respondent is directed to consider the report, take a decision and pass appropriate orders within a period of twelve(12) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶21

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

¶22

Sd/-

¶23

Assistant Registrar(CS-V)

¶24

//True Copy//

¶25

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶26

msv TO

¶27

1.The Secretary to Govt.

¶28

Government of Tamil Nadu Department of Labour and Employment Fort St George - 600 109 Chennai.

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

The Assistant Commissioner of Labour/ Labour Officer, Krishnagiri.

¶31

+1cc to Mr.K.SUDALAIKANNU, Advocate, S.R.No.37619 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No. 37541

¶32

W.P.No.7796 of 2018 and W.M.P.No.9710 of 2018

¶33

BR(CO) TR(22/06/2018)

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Micro Labs and Brown and v. The Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Micro Labs and Brown and v. The Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

L.Samipillai, Vs The Zonal Manager / Deputy

K. Syed Yousuff Vs R. Anandhapadmanaban

M/s. Renault Nissan Technology Vs The Regional Provident Fund

P.Parthiban Vs Mr. Gajendran

Tmt.B.Sivakami Vs The Joint Director of School

M/s.Amarambedu Munuswamy Vs The Employees State