This writ petition, filed for quashing a suspension order, was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner had already endorsed that the prayer had become infructuous.
No order as to costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :12.06.2018
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.11918 of 2016
and
W.M.P.No.10296 of 2016
L.Samipillai ..Petitioner
vs
1.The Zonal Manager/Deputy General Manager,
Bank of India,
Coimbatore Zone,
Star House, 324 Oppanakara Street,
Coimbatore – 641 001.
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the entire records on the file of the 3rd respondent in connection with the order of suspension dated 24.02.2015 vide in Ref.No.ZO:CBE:IR:263 and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Ramakrishnan For Respondent : Mr.S.Sathiya Narayan
2
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J
kak
O R D E R
The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer in this writ petition has already became infructuous and he had also made an endorsement to that effect.
W.P.No.11918 of 2016
1 provisions across 1 enactments
L.Samipillai
The Zonal Manager/Deputy General Manager, Bank of India, Coimbatore Zone
The Zonal manager, HR Department, Bank of India, Coimbatore Zone
The Assistant General Manager & Competent Authority, Bank of India, Coimbatore Zone
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
