Disposed

A.Satheesh, v. The Inspector General of

Madras HC17 Dec 2018WP/7537/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking direction to registration authorities to consider a representation regarding false stamp paper used in a sale deed registration and cancel the deed. Court directed respondents to consider the representation, issue notices, and hold a hearing within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to consider petitioner's representation, issue notices to petitioner and fourth respondent, and pass appropriate orders on merits within four weeks.

A.Satheesh, Vs The Inspector General of — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 17.12.2018

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA

¶5

W.P. No.7537 of 2018

¶6

A.Satheesh .. Petitioner

¶7

Vs.

¶8

1.The Inspector General of Registration, Office of the Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Chennai.

¶9

2.The District Registrar (Administration), North Chennai Registration District, Beach Road, Chennai – 600 001. 3.The Sub Registrar, Arani Sub Registrar Office, Arani, Thiruvallur District. 4.K.Shanmugam .. Respondents

¶10

PRAYER : Writ Petitions filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the representation made by the petitioner dated 18.08.2017 as received by the 2^nd respondent on 18.08.2017 and take necessary action in accordance with law.

¶11

The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to consider his representation dated 18.08.2017 as received by the 2^nd respondent on 18.08.2017 and to take necessary action in accordance with law.

¶12

According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner has submitted a representation dated 18.08.2017 requesting to enquire into the offence committed by the fourth respondent herein in presenting false stamp https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

paper for the purpose of registration of the sale deed in Document No.758/2002 before the Sub Registrar, Arani and to cancel the sale deed dated 18.04.2002, but, the same is yet to be disposed of by the second respondent. Hence, the petitioner is before this Court.

¶14

Heard Mr.M.L.Ramesh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.T.M.Pappiah, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 as well as Mr.N.R.Anantharamakrishnan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.4.

¶15

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made on either side, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the representation, directs the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the petitioner's representations dated 18.08.2017 and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, after issuing notice to the petitioner, fourth respondent and the persons interested in this regard and also affording them due opportunity of personal hearing, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶16

5.With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶17

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS )
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
rsi
To

¶18

1.The Inspector General of Registration, Office of the Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Chennai.

¶19

2.The District Registrar (Administration), North Chennai Registration District, Beach Road, Chennai – 600 001.

¶20

3.The Sub Registrar, Arani Sub Registrar Office, Arani, Thiruvallur District.

¶21

+1cc to Mr.M.L.Ramesh , Advocate SR.No. 87234

¶22

+1cc to Mr..R.Anantharamakrishnan , Advocate SR.No. 87723 W.P. No.7537 of 2018

¶23

A.SK(22/01/2019)

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

A.Satheesh, v. The Inspector General of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Satheesh, v. The Inspector General of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Deiveegam Vs The District Collector

M.Murugan Vs The District Collector

Tmt.N.P.Geethanchali Vs The Inspector General of

K.Ambusam, Vs The District Collector

V.Chitralekha Vs The Executive Officer

P.Chritstal Jeyaraj, Vs The Chief Immigration Officer