Disposed

S.Deiveegam v. The District Collector

Madras HC14 Dec 2018WP/33055/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the second respondent, the Revenue Divisional Officer, to conduct an enquiry into a representation seeking cancellation of a free assignment patta held by the fourth respondent, and to pass appropriate orders within five weeks after issuing notices and providing hearings to the petitioner and interested parties.

What did the court decide?

Direction to pass an order within five weeks after issuing notices to the petitioner, fourth and fifth respondents, and interested parties.

S.Deiveegam Vs The District Collector — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 14.12.2018

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA

¶5

W.P.No.33055 of 2018

¶6

S.Deiveegan .. Petitioner

¶7

Vs.
1. The District Collector,
Villupuram District,
Villupuram.
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Thirukovilur,
Villupuram District.
3. The Tahsildar,
Kandachipuram Taluk Office,
Kandachipuram,
Villupuram District.
4. M.Ambika
5.R.Manickam .. Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus,
directing the second
respondent to conduct enquiry and pass orders on the
petitioner's representation dated 16.12.2017 for
cancellation of free assignment patta granted in favour of
the fourth respondent within a reasonable time fixed by
this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Gandhi
For Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr.E.Balamurugan
Special Government Pleader
O R D E R

¶8

By consent of both parties, the Writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

2.The petitioner has come up with this writ petition seeking a direction to the second respondent to conduct enquiry based on his representation dated 16.12.2017 for cancellation of free assignment patta granted in favour of the fourth respondent.

¶11

3.According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner has submitted a representation dated 16.12.2017 to the respondents 1 to 3 requesting to conduct enquiry for cancellation of free assignment patta granted in favour of the fourth respondent, but, the same is yet to be disposed of by the second respondent. Hence, the petitioner is before this Court.

¶12

Heard Mr.E.Balamurugan, learned Special Government Pleader on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3.

¶13

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made on either side, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the representation, directs the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation 16.12.2017 and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, after issuing notice to the petitioner, the respondents 4 & 5 herein as well as any of the interested parties and also affording them an opportunity of personal hearing within a period of five weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶14

6.With the above directions, this writ petition stands

¶15

disposed of. No costs. Sd/-

¶16

Assistant Registrar(CS vi)

¶17

//True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar

¶18

av/rsi To 1. The District Collector, Villupuram District, Villupuram. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thirukovilur, Villupuram District.

¶19

The Tahsildar, Kandachipuram Taluk Office, Kandachipuram, Villupuram District. +1cc to Mr. T.Gandhi, Advocate SR.No. 86566 +1 CC TO GOVERNMENT PLEADER SR.NO. 87470

¶20

W.P.No.33055 of 2018 ASK(07/01/2019)

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Deiveegam v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Deiveegam v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deivasigamani, Vs The District Revenue officer

D.Kannan Vs The Executive Engineer

M.K.Stalin Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

M.Murugan Vs The District Collector

Tmt.N.P.Geethanchali Vs The Inspector General of

K.Raji,S/o.Kulli,Kollakkottai Vs The Tahsildar,Tirupathur Taluk