Dismissed

The Executive Engineer v. The Inspector of Labour

Madras HC26 Mar 2018WP/6894/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking quashing of an Award under the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981, on the ground of delay caused by a lack of explanation from the petitioners in their affidavit.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition dismissed on the ground of delay due to laches as no explanation was provided in the affidavit.

The Executive Engineer Vs The Inspector… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 26.03.2018

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.RAJA

¶5

W.P. No.6894 of 2018 and W.M.P.No.8540 of 2018

¶6

1.The Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board, Maintenance Division, No.5(1), College Road, 2^nd Cross Street, Odakadu, Tirupur. 2.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board, No.31, Kamarajar Salai, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. .. Petitioners Vs. 1.The Inspector of Labour, Tirupur, [Authority under the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981]. 2.K.Perumal 3.S.Eswaran 4.P.Karuppusami 5.K.Suresh 6.K.Murugan 7.N.Murugavel 8.S.Seniyappan .. Respondents

¶7

PRAYER : Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records made in the impugned Award Na.Ka.No.E/2350/2011 dated 17.12.2014, passed by the Inspector of Labour, Tirupur [Authority under the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Conferment of Permanent status to workmen) Act, 1981], the first respondent, quash the same.

¶8

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Eraskine Leo For Respondent No.1 : Mr.V.Kadhirvelu Special Government Pleader

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

By consent, this Writ Petition is taken up and disposed of at the stage of admission itself.

¶12

2.This Writ Petition is directed against the old order dated 17.12.2014 passed by the Inspector of Labour, Tirupur, the first respondent herein, taking various grounds and one among the ground says that when their being any relationship of employer employee between the petitioner and the respondent and also overlooking the fact that all the workmen / employees are working, the respondents 2 to 7 are working under the contract basis, the first respondent has wrongly passed the order.

¶13

But, this Court is not inclined to entertain the said claim made by the petitioners. The reason is that when the first respondent has passed the order impugned on 17.12.2014, finding fault in support of questioning the correctness of the impugned order, it is not found anywhere in the affidavit filed in support of the petitioners even one word of explanation leave alone the sufficient cause. Therefore, holding the petitioners as guilty of latches. Accordingly, the Writ Petition fails and the same is dismissed on the ground of delay. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶14

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-VI) //True Copy//

¶15

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶16

sri To

¶17

The Inspector of Labour, Tirupur,

¶18

[Authority under the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981].

¶19

+1cc to Mr.S.ERASKINE LEO, Advocate, S.R.No. 22736 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No. 24643

¶20

W.P. No.6894 of 2018 and W.M.P.No.8540 of 2018 RJI(CO) TR(19/04/2018)

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The Executive Engineer v. The Inspector of Labour

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Executive Engineer v. The Inspector of Labour

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rev.Sr.Lourdu Mary Vs The State of Tamilnadu

G.Sathya, Vs The Director of School

S.Chidambaram Vs The Director of School

Mrs. K.Sutha Vs The Director

S.Pechiammal Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

S.Sivashanmugam Vs The Director