13.Undoubtedly, in the event of any gross injustice, the same can directly be questioned under the article 226 of the Constitution of India. However, such circumstances are exceptional and can never be followed as a routine one. Thus, this court is of an opinion on each and every occasion, the employees of the Co-operative Societies cannot be permitted to file writ petition directly without exhausting the remedy available under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983. The exceptional circumstances are carved out in the case of K. Marappan Vs. Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Namakkal reported in 2006 (4) CTC 689. However, in the cases of Disciplinary proceedings, the aggrieved person has to exhaust the remedies available under the Act. If the writ petitions are admitted directly without exhausting the remedies available within the power provided under the statute is not exercised and such circumstances are certainly to be avoided by the Constitutional Courts. In this view of the Matter, this Court is of an opinion that the order impugned is the final order in the departmental disciplinary proceedings and the major penalty of termination of service is inflicted upon the writ petitioner. Undoubtedly, the writ petitioner has to prefer Revision Petition under the Act itself. The learned counsel for the petitioner made a submission that on account of the pendency of the present writ petition, there is delay in
