Dr.Vidyaa Hari Iyer, v. The Additional Central
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner submitted she received the provident fund amount during petition pendency. Court closed the writ petition finding no further adjudication required.
What did the court decide?
no order as to costs
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 16.04.2018
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.32759 of 2017
Dr.Vidyaa Hari Iyer ..Petitioner
.Vs.
1.The Additional Central Provident Fund Commissioner, Office of the Addl. Central Provident Fund Commissioner, Chennai & Puducherry, Employees Provident fund Regional Office, 37, Royapettah High Road,
Azad Nagar, Royapettah, Chennai-600 014.
2.M/s.Metallic Bellows India Pvt.Ltd., Rep.by its Managing Director, 3/136, East Coast Road, Vettuvankeni, Injambakkam, Chennai-600 115. .. Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 1st respondent to disburse the amounts lying in Member ID No.TNMAS00198250000000362 to the petitioner, the sole surviving only legal heir of the deceased G.Hari, who is petitioner husband, in accordance with the Hindu Succession Act, after obtaining the requisite signature from the 2nd respondent.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dr. Vidyaa Hari Iyer
- respondent
The Additional Central Provident Fund Commissioner
- respondent
M/s. Metallic Bellows India Pvt. Ltd.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court