A petitioners challenged an order classifying them as Hoisery Manufacturers instead of Tailoring Industry. Upon a new Government Order altering the classification, the court closed the writ petitions without adjudication.
Writ petitions stood closed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 19.04.2018
C O R A M
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.Nos.6116 to 6119 of 2017 and W.M.P.Nos.6593 to 6596 of 2017
Rathna Impex, Rep.by its Managing Partner - Mr.S.Balamurughavel, No.5/574-2B, Sri Ganesh Nagar, Pitchampalayam Pudhur, Tirupur - 641 603. ..Petitioner in W.P.No.6116/2017 Bhuvaneswari Tex, Rep.by its Manager - Mr.R.Gnanasekaran, Door No.2/785 B, Mahalakshmi Nagar, Palladam Road, Naranapuram Post, Palladam Taluk, Tirupur - 641 664. ..Petitioner in W.P.No.6117/2017 Victus Dyeings Garment Division, Rep.by its General Manager - Mr.S.Kasi, S.F.No.144/A2, Palani Road, Palappampatti, S.V.Mills Post, Udamalpet - 641 128. ..Petitioner in W.P.No.6118/2017 Vee Cee Exports, Rep.by its Proprietor - Mr.M.R.Ramesh, S.F.No.355/B1, Vivid Garden, Kovilvazhi, Dharapuram Road, Tirupur, Tamilnadu-641 608. ..Petitioner in W.P.No.6119/2017 Vs.
1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep by its Secretary Labour and Employment Department Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009. ..Respondent in all WPs
2.The Joint Director of Industrial Safety and Health-II, Tirupur District, Tirupur .. 2nd Respondent in W.P.Nos.6116 to 6118/2017 3.The Joint Director of Industrial Safety and Health, Tirupur District, Tirupur .. 2nd Respondent in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ W.P.No.6119/2017
Common Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents, their men, officers, agents, servants, representatives and /or any one claiming through or under them and /or any other person from in any manner applying the Impugned Government order in G.O.(2D) No.59, Labour Employment (J1) Department dated 10.10.2014 and published in Part-II Section 2 of the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette dated 03.12.2014 on the petitioner who are differently placed as Hoisery Manufactory(G.O.(2D), No.5 Labour and Employment(J1) Department dated 27.01.2016) and not as Tailoring Industry.
The learned Additional Advocate General appearing on behalf of the State made a submission that the Government has issued G.O.(2D) No.11, Labour and Employment (J1) Department, dated 06.02.2018 and issued notification to that effect.
2.In view of the said Government order, no further adjudication is required in respect of the grounds raised in these writ petitions.
3.Accordingly, these writ petitions stand closed. However, there is no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS )
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
maya To
1.The Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu Labour and Employment Department Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.
W.P.Nos.6116 to 6119 of 2017
AD(CO) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ EU(28/05/2018 )
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to issue writ of Mandamus holding the petitioners as 'Hoisery Manufactory' instead of 'Tailoring Industry'.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Rathna Impex
Bhuvaneswari Tex
Victus Dyeings Garment Division
Vee Cee Exports
S.M. Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
