T.Adhiyaman v. Niranjan Mardi, I.A.S.
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition filed to punish the respondent for disobeying an earlier order. The court accepted the submission that the previous order was complied with by the lower authority. The petition was closed with no order as to costs.
What did the court decide?
contempt petition closed; no order as to costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 18.04.2018
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Contempt Petition No.222 of 2018
1.T.Adiyaman
2.S.Arumugam
3.A.Balamurugan
4.K.Rajendran
5.S.Muruganantham
6.R.velayutham
7.S.Ganesan
8.N.Suresh
9.V.Loganathan
10.M.Sujatha ... Petitioners
Vs.
M/s.Niranjan Mardi, I.A.S.,
The Principal Secretary to Government,
Home Department[Tr.IV]
Secretariat,
Chennai – 9. ...Respondent
Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent for willfully and deliberately disobeying the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 21.8.17 made in W.P.No.22154/17.
For Petitioners : M/s.S.Vijayakumar For Respondent : Mr.M.Elumalai, GA
2
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
T.Adiyaman and others
- respondent
M/s.Niranjan Mardi, I.A.S., The Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department
Coram
S.M.Subramaniam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court