Partly allowed

K.suresh v. The Project Director

Madras HC6 Dec 2018WP/32243/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This petition challenged a realigned road map affecting the petitioner's land. The High Court directed the District Revenue Officer to consider the petitioner's objections and pass an appropriate order on merits within six weeks before dismissing the petition.

What did the court decide?

Directed the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's objections to the alignment and pass orders on merits within six weeks.

K.suresh Vs The Project Director — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 06.12.2018

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN

¶5

W.P. 32243 of 2018 and W.M.P.s 37508 & 37512 of 2018

¶6

K.Suresh ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Project Director, National Highways Authority of India, G 5 & 6, Sector-19, Dwaraka, New Delhi – 110 075. 2. The Authorised Officer/ District Revenue Officer (LA), National Highways, Collectorate, Dharmapuri-636 705. ... Respondents

¶7

PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue appropriate Writs, orders or Directions and in particular issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records culminating in their impugned Village Map (CH: 48+630 TO 50+100) bearing DWG No. BMP/VILLAGE MAP – 4 A and other acquisition proceedings pertaining to the six laning of Hosur-Royakottah – Dharmapuri Section of NH844, quash the same in so far as it relates to the petitioner's lands comprised in Survey Nos.222/2, 222/5, 222/7A, 222/7B, 222/8A, 222/8B and 222/3 measuring an extent of about 1.26 acres situated at Velakala Alli Village, Palacode Taluk, Dharmapuri District pursuant to the deliberate re-alingment of the proposed road and direct the respondents to proceed with the original alignment of the road, which does not affect the petitioner's said lands.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.Arul Anbumani For Respondents : Mr.Su.Srinivasan, Addl. Standing Counsel forR1

¶9

Mr.C.Thirumaran, Special Government Pleader for R2

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

This writ petition has been filed challenging the alignment map said to have prepared by the respondents in respect of forming six laning of Hosur-Royakottah – Dharmapuri under the National Highways Act.

¶13

The grievance of the petitioner is that, now the respondents are deviating from the original alignment in order to favour a particular individual, the road has been realigned, and the present alignment proposed by the respondents is affecting the petitioner's property. Hence, the present Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner.

¶14

Mr.Su.Srinivasan, learned counsel appearing for the 1^st respondent submitted that originally, there are three proposals prepared for forming the road. After having elaborate discussion, and after obtaining expert opinion, the present alignment has been finalised. Hence, there is no malafide in it. However, the enquiry under Sec.3-C of the National Highwas Act has already conducted, and the petitioner has also appeared and raised his objection including the change of alignment. So far, no order has been passed in the enquiry.

¶15

In the above circumstances, as the petitioner has already approached the authorities and raised his objection regarding the alignment, this Court is of the view that it is suffice to direct the 2^nd respondent to consider the petitioner's objections and pass suitable orders on merits and in accordance with law. The above exercise should be completed within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.

¶16

In the result, the present Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶17

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)

¶18

//True Copy//

¶19

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

rpp
To
1. The Project Director,
National Highways Authority of India,
G 5 & 6, Sector-19, Dwaraka,
New Delhi – 110 075.
2. The Authorised Officer/
District Revenue Officer (LA),
National Highways,
Collectorate,
Dharmapuri-636 705.
+1cc to M/S.Arun Anbumani, Advocate Sr.84953
+1cc to the Government Pleader Sr.84420
W.P. 32243 of 2018
and
W.M.P.s 37508 & 37512
of 2018
nmi[co]
srg 31/01/2019

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.suresh v. The Project Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.suresh v. The Project Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

m/s. Hotel New grants Vs The Commissioner

P.G.Sambantham Vs the Commissioner

P.Sureshbabu Vs The INspector of Police

S.Kaviarasan Bharathy, Vs The District Elementary

M.Subramani Vs The joint Registrar

G.Palani Vs The Secretary to Government