Petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging proceedings by the respondent. The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition. The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the writ petition with no costs.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.08.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
W.P.No.30321 of 2014
K.Ganesan .. Petitioner
Vs The District Forest Officer, Salem Division, Salem. .. Respondent
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings issued by the respondent in Na.Ka.No.11319/2012/T dated 20.01.2014 and to quash the same and consequently allow the petitioner to run the Saw Mill based on the licence granted in Form II under Tamil Nadu Regulation of Wood Based Industries Rules, 2010 dated 22.01.2013.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Sankaran For Respondents : Mr.S.V.Vijayprashanth Additional Government Pleader(F) ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
vga
To
The District Forest Officer, Salem Division, Salem.
+1cc to Mr.G.Sankaran, Advocate, S.R.No.57587
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No. 56973
WP.No.30321 of 2014
CS/05/09/18
K. Ganesan
The District Forest Officer, Salem Division, Salem
R. Mahadevan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
