Disposed

G.K.Thennavan v. The Managing Director

Madras HC9 Nov 2018WP/29214/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Nine retired employees filed a writ petition seeking direction to pay their retirement benefits with interest. Relying on a prior order scheduling full settlement in nine monthly instalments, the Court directed payment via twelve equal monthly instalments upon a representation made by the petitioners.

What did the court decide?

Directed to pay terminal benefits in twelve equal monthly instalments, first instalment payable on or before 01st January 2019.

G.K.Thennavan Vs The Managing Director — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 09.11.2018

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE S.VIMALA

¶5

W.P.No.29214 of 2018

¶6

1.G.K.Thennavan 2.B.Balaramakrishnan 3.K.Chenniappan 4.P.Selvakumar 5.C.T.Muthu Sundaram 6.K.Balasubramanian 7.C.Kasnagarajan 8.S.Venkatachalapathi 9.K.R.Muthuswamy ..Petitioners Vs. Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (CBE) Limited, 37, Mettupalayam Road Coimbatore – 641 013. ..Respondent

¶7

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent herein to pay the retirement benefits with interest to the petitioners as per their representation made to the respondent on 23.07.2018.

¶8

For Petitioners : M/s.S.Balasubramanian For Respondent : Mr.R.S.Selvam, Standing Counsel for T/N.

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

This writ petition is filed by nine petitioners, seeking direction to the respondent herein to pay the retirement benefits with interest to the petitioners as per their representation made to the respondent on 23.07.2018.

¶11

The petitioners are the retired employees of the respondent corporation. They have retired from service on various dates in the year 2018. However, their retirement benefits have not yet been paid by the respondent. Hence the petitioners gave a representation to the respondent dated 23.07.2018, requesting the respondent to pay the retirement benefits, and the same has not yet been considered till date.

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

That has forced the petitioners to approach this Court by way of the present writ petition.

¶14

Earlier, this Court in W.P(Md).No.2629 of 2015., directed the Transport Corporation to settle the retirement benefits to the retired employees in nine equal monthy instalments with interest at 6% per annum for the entire amount and in case of delay in paying the monthly instalments, interest to be paid at 18% per annum.

¶15

Accordingly, following the earlier order of this Court, without going into the merits of the matter, the respondent is directed to settle the terminal benefits of the petitioners in twelve equal monthly instalments and the first of such instalments shall be paid on or before 01^st January 2019. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶16

Kst Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To The Managing Director,Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (CBE) Limited, 37, Mettupalayam Road,Coimbatore – 641 013. +9ccs to M/s.S.Balasubramanian, Advocate S.R.No.76576 KR/9/11/18

¶17

W.P.No.29214 of 2018

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

G.K.Thennavan v. The Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.K.Thennavan v. The Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B.Karuppaiah Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Assistant Elementary Vs The Presiding Officer

Mrs.K.Parimala Vs The Deputy commissioner of

M.Ravikumar Vs The Secretary to Government

D. Murugesan Vs The Managing Director

P.Somasundaram Vs The Managing Director