The High Court of Judicature at Madras heard a writ petition under Article 226 but dismissed it as withdrawn by the petitioner after counsel circulated a withdrawal letter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 19.11.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE
Writ Petition No.27813 of 2018 and W.M.P.Nos.32324 and 32325 of 2018
S.Venkata Varadhan ... Petitioner
-Vs-
1.The Commissioner
HR & CE Department
119, Mahatma Gandhi Road
Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034.
2.Joint Commissioner
HR & CE Department
Tiruchirapalli District – 620 001.
3.Assistant Commissioner
HR & CE Department, Srirangam
Tiruchirapalli – 620 001.
4.Srirangam Srimath Andavan Ashramam
Desikachari Street, Mylapore,
Chennai – 600 004.
5.Shri R.Rajagopal
6.Shri R.Vasudevan
7.Shri Needamangalam Gopalaswami
8.Shri C.R.Ravichandran
9.Shri R.Venkatesh
10.Shri Ammangi V Balaji
11.Shri R.Rajagopalan
12.Shri Yamunachariyar .... Respondents
Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 5 to 11, or any other persons acting either by or through them, not to amount the 12th respondent or any other person as the 12th plaintiff of the 4th Respondent in addition to directing the
respondents 5 to 11 to not alienate / sell / transfer / encumber any and all assets of the 4th respondent Ashram and its trusts, whether movable or immovable and pass an order appointing a committee consisting of experts and Vidwans with extensive knowledge in Sri Vaishnavism Sampradhaya, Dharmic practices, vedas, traditions and customs.
For Petitioner : Mrs.Chitra Sampath
For Respondents : Mr.M.Maharaja, Special Govt.Pleader - for RR 1 to 3 Mr.V.Raghavachari – for RR 4,5 and 7
O R D E R
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has circulated
a letter dated 14.11.2018, requesting the registry to list this
writ petition for withdrawal. Accordingly, it is listed before
this Court today.
2. Heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the
petitioner as well as the respondents. In the light of the
letter circulated, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are
closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-VI)
//True copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
kst
To
1. The Commissioner,
HR & CE Department,
119, Mahatma Gandhi Road
Nungambakkam,
Chennai – 600 034.
2. The Joint Commissioner
HR & CE Department,
Tiruchirapalli District – 620001
3. The Assistant Commissioner,
HR & CE Department,
Srirangam, Tiruchirapalli -620 001.
+1cc to Mr.S.R.Raghunatha, Advocate SR.No.79424
+1cc to Mr.V.Raghavachari, Advocate SR.No.78561
+1cc to Government Pleader SR.No.8011
W.P. No.27813 of 2018 and W.M.P.Nos.32324 & 32325 of 2018
Ks(CO) GMY(13/12/2018)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. Venkata Varadhan
The Commissioner, HR & CE Department
Joint Commissioner, HR & CE Department
Assistant Commissioner, HR & CE Department
Srirangam Srimath Andavan Ashramam
Shri R. Rajagopal
M. Sathyanarayanan
N. Seshasayee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
