A writ petition challenging a shutdown order was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner obtained license renewal, despite a contention by the third respondent alleging misrepresentation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.12.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
W.P. 24018 of 2018
and W.M.P. 27980 of 2018
K.Ameer John ... Petitioner
Vs. 1. The Commissioner, Greater Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Buildings, Chennai-600 003.
PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the 2nd respondent's order No.nil dated 20.04.2018 to quash the same and to consequently direct the respondents 1st and 2nd to issue necessary trading license to the petitioner to run the eating house at No.9, Govindan Street, Kodambakkam Road, West Mambalam, Chennai-600 033.
For Petitioner : Mr.L.Chandrakumar For Respondents : Mr.V.C.Selvasekaran, Standing Counsel for R1 & R2 Mr.MA.P.Thangavel for R3
This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order issued under the Chennai City Municipal Corporation Act to close the shop on the ground that the petitioner is running the shop without having a license.
s/d-
Assistant Registrar(CO)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar rpp To
+1 CC to Mr.L.Chandrakumar , Advocate sr 84655.
+1 CC to Mr.Ma.P.Thangavel, Advocate sr 85026.
W.P. 24018 of 2018 and W.M.P. 27980 of 2018
BS(CO) SP(21/12/2018)
K. Ameer John
The Commissioner, Greater Corporation of Chennai
A. J. Pandian
V. Bharathidasan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
