Disposed

M/s.Mefco Engineers Pvt.Ltd., v. The Assistant Commissioner(Ct)

Madras HC23 Jul 2018WP/18668/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a writ petition filed under Article 226 directing the Assistant Commissioner of Taxes to consider unaddressed rectification petitions filed by the petitioner, afford a personal hearing, and pass orders within three weeks.

What did the court decide?

Ordered the respondent to consider the petitions on merits, afford a personal hearing, and pass orders within three weeks.

M/s.Mefco Engineers Pvt.Ltd., Vs The… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras

¶2

Dated : 23.7.2018

¶3

Coram :

¶4

The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM

¶5

Writ Petition No.18668 of 2018 & WMP.No.22003 of 2018

¶6

M/s.MEFCO Engineers Private Limited, rep.by its Director ...Petitioner

¶7

¶8

The Assistant Commissioner (CT) (FAC), Egmore Assessment Circle, Taluk Office Building,No.78 Mayor Ramanathan Salai, Egmore,Chennai-31.

¶9

...Respondent

¶10

PETITION under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent herein to dispose of the rectification petition dated 10.4.2017 in the light of the judgment reported in 100 VST 158 after affording an opportunity to the petitioner.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mrs.Hema Muralikrishnan For Respondent : Mr.M.Hariharan, AGP ORDER

¶12

Mr.M.Hariharan, learned Additional Government Pleader accepts notice for the respondent. Heard both. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

¶13

The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent to consider the rectification petition dated 10.4.2017 filed under Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006.

¶14

From the papers placed before this Court, it is seen that the said rectification petition dated 10.4.2017 has been received by the office of the respondent on 11.4.2017 as could be seen from the seal and signature in the letter delivery book. Subsequently, another petition dated 15.6.2017 has also been filed by the petitioner seeking to give an opportunity of personal hearing and it has been received by the office of the respondent on 22.6.2017, as evidenced from the endorsement in the letter delivery book. Since the said petitions have not been considered, the petitioner has approached this Court.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent submits that reasonable time may be granted to the respondent to consider the said petitions.

¶17

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the petitioner to consider the petitions filed by the petitioner dated 10.4.2017 and 15.6.2017 on merits, afford an opportunity of personal hearing and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, the connected WMP is closed.

¶18

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
The Assistant Commissioner (CT) (FAC), Egmore Assessment Circle,
Taluk Office Building,No.78 Mayor Ramanathan Salai,
Egmore, Chennai-31.
+1cc to Mr.B.Raveendran, Advocate, S.R.No.49124
+1cc to the Spl Government Pleader, S.R.No.49566
WP.No.18668 of 2018&
WMP.No.22003 of 2018
SSV(CO)
GSP(09/08/2018)

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/s.Mefco Engineers Pvt.Ltd., v. The Assistant Commissioner(Ct)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Mefco Engineers Pvt.Ltd., v. The Assistant Commissioner(Ct)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C. Sasikumar, Vs Smt. Sundaravalli, I.A.S.

Tvl.Anis Paints, Vs the Assistant Commissioner of

S.Sakayaraj Vs The Commissioner

N.Raja, Vs The Assistant Commissioner

Tvl. Datang Technologies & Vs The Commercial Tax Officer

M/s.Globe Ecologistics (P) Ltd. Vs The Deputy commercial Tax