Dismissed

S.Sakayaraj v. The Commissioner

Madras HC20 Jul 2018WP/13358/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge bench disposed of a writ petition seeking mandamus to direct the Coimbatore Municipal Corporation to consider a representation dated 04.3.2014 regarding exemption from property tax for a place of worship within three months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Competent Authority of the respondent Corporation to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.3.2014 and pass appropriate orders on merits within three months.

S.Sakayaraj Vs The Commissioner — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras

¶2

Dated : 20.7.2018

¶3

Coram :

¶4

The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM

¶5

Writ Petition No.13358 of 2016

¶6

S.Sakayaraj ..Petitioner

¶7

¶8

1.The Commissioner, Coimbatore Municipal Corporation, Big Bazaar Street, Town Hall, Coimbatore-1.

¶9

2.The Assistant Commissioner, Coimbatore North Zone, Coimbatore Corporation, P.N.Palayam, Coimbatore. ..Respondents

¶10

PETITION under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to consider and pass orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 04.3.2014 on merits by considering the documents submitted by the petitioner within the stipulated period.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.Manikandan for Mr.R.Rajiv Gandhi

¶12

For Respondent : Mr.K.Natarajan

¶13

ORDER

¶14

Heard both.

¶15

The petitioner filed this writ petition seeking a direction to the second respondent to consider and pass orders on the representation dated 04.3.2014.

¶16

In the said representation, the petitioner sought for grant of exemption from the levy of property tax in respect of the property in question, which, according to the petitioner, is a place of worship.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

The learned counsel for the respondents, on instructions, submits that the respondent – Corporation will consider the said representation on merits and in accordance with law.

¶19

In the light of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of by directing the Competent Authority of the respondent – Corporation to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 04.3.2014 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is well open to the respondent – Corporation to conduct an inspection of the premises in question and after following due process of law, take a decision on the request for exemption from levy of property tax. No costs.

¶20

Sd/Assistant Registrar(Audit) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Commissioner, Coimbatore Municipal Corporation, Big Bazaar Street, Town Hall, Coimbatore-1. 2.The Assistant Commissioner, Coimbatore North Zone, Coimbatore Corporation, P.N.Palayam, Coimbatore. + 1 cc to Mr. R. Rajiv Gandhi, Advocate Sr.49005 + 1 cc to Mr. K. Natarajan, Advocate Sr.49439 WP.No.13358 of 2016 NM(CO) EU(13/08/2018 )

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Sakayaraj v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Sakayaraj v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.S.Senthil Kumar, Vs Tax Recovery Officer

Uf Media Private Ltd. Vs The Assistant Commissioner of

Tvl.Millennium Motors, Vs The Assistant Commissioner(Ct)

C. Sasikumar, Vs Smt. Sundaravalli, I.A.S.

Tvl.Anis Paints, Vs the Assistant Commissioner of

M/s.Zehra Impex Vs The Commercial Tax