The High Court of Madras dismissed a writ petition filed for certiorari as infructuous because both sides represented in court that the relief sought had become unviable or irrelevant.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12.04.2018 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE S.VIMALA W.P.No.17512 of 2004 and W.P.M.P.Nos.20796 and 1249 of 2004
N.J.Paulraj ... Petitioner versus
Today, when the matter came up for consideration, it is represented by both sides that the relief sought for in the writ petition has become infrctuous. Hence, nothing survives for adjudication.
ogy
To
+1cc to Mr.M.Srinath Sridevan, Advocate SR.No.27946
+1cc to Government Pleader SR.No.27688
W.P.No.17512 of 2004
GN(08/06/2018)
N.J. Paulraj
The Joint Director of Agriculture
K. Sankaranarayanan
S. Vimala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
