S.Thangaraj v. Tamilnadu Veterinary and
Case brief
What is this about?
Two writ petitions filed by employees seeking regularization of services and monetary benefits were dismissed as withdrawn by the Supreme Bench on counsel's motion.
Two writ petitions filed by employees seeking regularization of services and monetary benefits were dismissed as withdrawn by the Supreme Bench on counsel's motion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12.04.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE S.VIMALA
W.P.Nos.16617 and 16618 of 2004
W.P.No.16617 of 2004
S.Thangaraj ... Petitioner versus
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records relating to the order of the 1st respondent bearing No.4829/RII/2003 dated 16.10.2003 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and consequently direct the 1st respondent to regularise the petitioner's services as Office Assistant / Attendant from the date of his appointment viz., 23.11.1980 and pay all the attendant and monetary benefits.
W.P.No.16618 of 2004
G.Veerapandiyan ... Petitioner versus 1. Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Rep. By its Registrar, Madhavaram Milk Colony, Chennai – 600 051.
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records relating to the order of the 1st respondent bearing No.4829/RII/2003 dated 16.10.2003 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and consequently direct the 1st respondent to regularise the petitioner's services as Office Assistant / Attendant from the date of his appointment viz., 17.05.1981 and pay all the attendant and monetary benefits.
For Petitioner in both W.Ps.: Mr.M.Nandhakumar
COMMON ORDER Today, when the matter came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petitions. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS IX) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To
+1cc to Mr.Aasokan, Advocate, S.R.No.27942
W.P.Nos.16617 and 16618 of 2004
GSP(07/06/2018)
S.Thangaraj
G.Veerapandiyan
Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University
Poultry Research Station
Dr. Justice S.Vimala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court