Disposed

A.C.Thangavelu, v. The Union of India

Madras HC11 Jun 2018WP/16690/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Public Interest Writ petition sought directions to make all District Amateur Kabadi Associations in Tamil Nadu registered societies. The Court held there was no patent illegality or legal right to force registration and granted liberty to the petitioner to seek internal rules for regulation.

What did the court decide?

Grant of liberty to the petitioner to approach the State Amateur Kabadi Association to frame rules regulating membership of unregistered district associations.

A.C.Thangavelu, Vs The Union of India — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 11.06.2018

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

The Hon'ble Ms.INDIRA BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶5

AND

¶6

The Hon'ble Ms.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA

¶7

W.P. No.16690 of 2017 and W.M.P.Nos.18070,18071 and 27915 of 2017

¶8

A.C.Thangavelu .. Petitioner -vs-

¶9

1.The Union of India Rep. by its Secretary, Govt, Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, Shastri Bhawan, Dr.Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi 110 001. 2.The Sports Authority of india, Rep. by its Secretary, SAI Head Office, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium Complex (East Gate), Lodhi Road, New Delhi 110003. 3.The Amateur Kabadi Federation of India, Rep. by its Secretary, No.33, Bhrigu Nagar, 2nd Floor, (Opp.Geholt's Bungalow), Ajmer Road, Jaipur-302 021. 4.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, The Ministry of Youth Welfare and Sports, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009. 5.Sports Development Authority of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, No.116, Nehru Stadium, EVR Periyar High Road, Chennai 600 084. 6.The Tamil Nadu Amateur Kabadi Assn., Rep. by its Secretary, Thirupur.

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

7.N.K.K.P.Sathyan 8.Anbazhagan 9.Saffullah 10.The District Collector, Erode District. (R-10 suo motu impleaded as per order dt.4.7.2017 in WP.16690/2017)

¶12

11.P.Muthumani 12.V.Murugan 13.R.Kannan 14.R.Jaikkumar 15.V.Sivakumar 16.S.S.Kalidoss 17.C.Murugan 18.T.Sarath Kumar (RR11 to 18 impleaded as per order of Court dt.11.06.2018 in WMP.36333/2017) .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Mandamus to direct respondents 1 to 6 to make all the District Amateur Kabadi Associations in the State of Tamil Nadu as Societies registered under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975 and not to allow any unregistered associations to continue as the affilidated District Kabadi Associations under the 6th respondent.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Srinivas For Respondents : Mr.B.Rabu Manohar Sr.CGPC, for R-1 : Mr.G.Karthikeyan Asst. Solicitor Genl. for RR 2 & 3 : Mr.E.Manoharan Addl.G.P. for RR 4 & 10 : Mr.I.Sathish for R-5 : Mr.A.Gunaseelan for RR 6 & 9 : Mr.N.Manokaran for R-7 : Mr.J.Chandransundar Sasikumar for R-8 : Mr.G.Vijayakumar for RR 11 to 18

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

(Made by Ms.Indira Banerjee, Chief Justice)

¶17

This writ petition has been filed in public interest seeking directions on respondent nos.1 to 6 to make all the District Amateur Kabadi Associations in the State of Tamil Nadu as societies registered under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975 and not to allow any unregistered associations to continue as the affiliated District Kabadi Associations under the 6^th respondent.

¶18

2.A preliminary objection has been taken to the writ petition on the ground that Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975, which provides for compulsory registration of certain societies, expressly excludes any society which has for its object promotion of athletics or sports (including indoor games).

¶19

3.We have gone through the by-laws of the Tamil Nadu State Amateur Kabadi Association. The by-laws do not restrict membership of the society only to registered Kabadi associations. On behalf of the petitioner, it is submitted that in the absence of any provision requiring registration of societies, there are no measures to regulate the functioning of these associations.

¶20

4.Unfortunately, in proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Courts might interfere where there is patent illegality. The Courts might also interfere for enforcement of a legal right. On the face of the averments, there is no illegality in not restricting membership to registered societies. Nor does the petitioner has any legal right to insist on restriction of membership only to registered societies.

¶21

5.If, as argued, there are any irregularities and/or malpractices by reason of absence of regulations regulating unregistered Kabadi associations, it is for the State Amateur Kabadi Association to frame rules and regulations to regulate its affiliate associations.

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

6.The writ petition is disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the State Amateur Kabadi Association / to make a representation to the Sports Development Authority of State of Tamil Nadu to consider framing rules to regulate membership of the District Amateur Kabadi Association. No costs. Consequently, W.M.P.Nos.18070, 18071 and 27915 of 2017 are closed.

¶24

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS IX) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar sra To 1.The Secretary to Union of India Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, Shastri Bhawan, Dr.Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi 110 001. 2.The Secretary, Sports Authority of India, SAI Head Office, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium Complex (East Gate), Lodhi Road, New Delhi 110003. 3.The Secretary, The Amateur Kabadi Federation of India, No.33, Bhrigu Nagar, 2nd Floor, (Opp.Geholt's Bungalow), Ajmer Road, Jaipur-302 021. 4.The Secretary, The State of Tamil Nadu, The Ministry of Youth Welfare and Sports, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶26

5.The District Collector, Erode District.

¶27

+1cc to Mr.B.Rabu Manohar, Advocate Sr.36340

¶28

+1cc to N.Manokaran, Advocate Sr.36390 +1cc to M/S.R.Srinivas, Advocate Sr.36345

¶29

+2cc to Mr.N.Vinayakamoorthy, Advocate Sr.36296

¶30

+1cc to Mr.G.Karthikeyan, Advocate Sr.36544

¶31

W.P.No.16690 of 2017
srg 09/07/2018

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

A.C.Thangavelu, v. The Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.C.Thangavelu, v. The Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.a.Kuppusamy, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

International Sri Vaishnava Vs The Chief Secretary

Saravanan, S/o.Periasamy Vs The District Collector

S.Kalimuthu, Vs The District Collector

Ashok Anand, Vs Union Territory of Puducherry

M.Radhakrishnan, Vs Union of India