Disposed

International Sri Vaishnava v. The Chief Secretary

Madras HC8 Jun 2018WP/7583/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition filed by the International Sri Vaishnava Ramanuja Samrajaya Sabha seeking directions for the safe conduct of Shri Ramanuja's 1000th birth anniversary scheduled for 12 April 2018. The court held the petition infructuous as the event date had passed. No costs awarded.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous; no costs.

International Sri Vaishnava Vs The… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 08.06.2018

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

The Hon'ble Ms.INDIRA BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶5

AND

¶6

The Hon'ble Ms.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA

¶7

W.P. No.7583 of 2018

¶8

International Sri Vaishnava Ramanuja Samrajaya Sabha (Reg.), rep. by its Secretary Swami Govinda Ramanuja Dasa, No.132, Gandhi Road, Sriperumbudur, Kanchipuram District. .. Petitioner in Person -vs1.The Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009. 2.The Secretary, Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009. 3.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments, 119, Uthamar Gandhi Road, Chennai - 600 034.

¶9

4.The Joint Commissioner (Vellore District), Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments, Sathuvachari, Vellore.

¶10

5.The District Collector, Kanchipuram District.

¶11

6.The Special Officer, Town Panchayat, East Station, Sriperumbudur, Kanchipuram District.

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

7.The Superintendent of Police, Kanchipuram.

¶14

8.The Executive Officer,

¶15

Sri Adikesava Perumal & Sri Bashyaakaraswamy Temple, Sriperumbudur, Kanchipuram District. .. Respondents

¶16

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Mandamus directing all the respondents to carry out immediately the activities, and provide the facilities, mentioned in the Annexure hereto, on or before 12 April 2018 and to maintain the same at Sriperumbudur to ensure the safe conduct of the 1000th year birth anniversary of Sahasrabdhi Poorthy Mahothsav of Shri Ramanuja.

¶17

For Petitioner : No Appearance
For Respondents : Mr.T.N.Rajagopalan
Government Pleader
for respondents 1, 5 and 7
Mr.M.Maharaja
Spl. Government Pleader (HR&CE)
for respondents 2, 3 and 4
ORDER
(Made by Ms.Indira Banerjee, Chief Justice)

¶18

This writ petition has been filed for direction on the respondents to ensure the safe conduct of the 1000th year birth anniversary of Sahasrabdhi Poorthy Mahothsav of Shri Ramanuja scheduled to be held on 12.04.2018.

¶19

The relief sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous.

¶20

The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. No costs. Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VII) //True Copy//

¶21

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

bbr

¶24

¶25

1.The Chief Secretary,
Government of Tamil Nadu,
Secretariat, Fort St. George,
Chennai - 600 009.
2.The Secretary,
Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Department,
Government of Tamil Nadu,
Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.
3.The Commissioner,
Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments,
119, Uthamar Gandhi Road,
Chennai - 600 034.
4.The Joint Commissioner (Vellore District),
Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments,
Sathuvachari, Vellore.
5.The District Collector,
Kanchipuram District.
6.The Superintendent of Police,
Kanchipuram.
+1cc to Government Pleader in sr.no.36045
+1cc to Special Government Pleader in sr.no.36679
W.P.No.7583 of 2018
ak(co)
nr 20/06/2018

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

International Sri Vaishnava v. The Chief Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

International Sri Vaishnava v. The Chief Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Larsen & Toubro Ltd., Vs M/S Baby Engineering Pvt. Ltd.

Mr. K. Rajendran Vs M/S. Tamil Nadu State

K.Shanmugam Vs The State of Tamilnadu

S.a.Kuppusamy, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Saravanan, S/o.Periasamy Vs The District Collector

A.K.Velan, Vs The District Collector