The single-judge High Court dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petition, seeking a direction for compassionate appointment, was disposed of noting that the petitioner's counsel had explicitly withdrawn the matter.
The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATE : 09.04.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE S.VIMALA
W.P. NO. 15482 OF 2002
Smt. Devaki @ Devika .. Petitioner
Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court to issue a writ of mandamus for a direction to the Commissioner of Chennai Corporation, the 1st respondent herein and take immediate action on the petitioner's representation dated 7.2.2001 and conduct special enquiry into the matter for compassionate appointment of the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr. C.Ponnusamy For Respondents: Mr.S.Saravanan for R-1 ORDER
When the matter was taken up, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this matter may be dismissed as withdrawn. He has also made an endorsement to the said effect on the petition. Recording the said endorsement, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sub-Assistant Registrar
GLN
To
W.P. NO.15482 OF 2002
MR(CO)
SP(20/04/2018)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Devaki @ Devika
The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai
Mrs. Lakshmi @ Lakshmiammal
Dr. Justice S.Vimala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
