Disposed

Mr.Bakrudin Ali Ahmed, v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC18 Sept 2018WP/15213/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this petition, the petitioner sought admission for his son under the RTE Act 2009. The Court recorded that admission had been granted pursuant to its own earlier order. Consequently, the Writ Petition was disposed of and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed without costs.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of; connected miscellaneous petition closed; no costs.

Mr.Bakrudin Ali Ahmed, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu — Education and Admissions | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 18.09.2018

¶2

CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN

¶3

W. P.No.15213 of 2017 and W.M.P.No.16499 of 2017

¶4

Bakrudin Ali Ahmed .. Petitioner Vs 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Education Department, Chennai. 2.The Joint Director of Matriculation Schools Education, DPI Compound, College Road, Chennai-34. 3.The Principal, MLM Mamallan Mat. Hr.Sec.School, KTS Mani Street, Mamallan Nagar, Kanchipuram-631 502. 4.The District Educational Officer, Kancheepuram. ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2^nd and 3^rd respondents to admit the petitioner's son Master Shafil Mubarak in I Standard for the year 2017-2018 as per application No.17R31100708 under the Quota of “The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act 2009” in the 3^rd respondent school. For Petitioner : Mr.I.Abdul Basith For Respondents : Mr.T.M.Pappaiah Special Government Pleader (for R1 and R2) Mr.Vijayakumar for Mr.Jayaraman Asso. (for R3)

¶5

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶6

O R D E R

¶7

It is represented that pursuant to the order of this Court, the petitioner's son Master Shafil Mubarak has been admitted in the 3^rd respondent school.

¶8

2.In view of the above, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

¶9

Sd/-

¶10

Assistant Registrar(CS V)

¶11

//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
ay/sai
To
1.The Secretary to Government,
Education Department,
Chennai.
2.The Joint Director of Matriculation
Schools Education,
DPI Compound,
College Road,
Chennai-34.
3.The District Educational Officer,
Kancheepuram.
+1cc to Mr.Vijayakumar, Advocate, S.R.No.64885
+1cc to Mr.Abdul Basith, Advocate, S.R.No.65623
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.65535

¶12

W.P.No.15213 of 2017

¶13

rrs 12/10/2018

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Mr.Bakrudin Ali Ahmed, v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr.Bakrudin Ali Ahmed, v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Dinesh Kumar (Minor), Ar No. Vs The Secretary

Dr.K.Prasanna Venkatachalam Vs The Director of School

C.Yesu Nesan, Vs The Chairman Cum Managing

Premavathy, W/o.Prakash, Vs The District Collector

D.Srinivasan Vs The Chairman

Minor.B.Kaviyanila, Vs The Chief Educational