C.Yesu Nesan, v. The Chairman Cum Managing
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge order closing a writ petition regarding restoration of electricity service connection. Counsel stated prior compliance, resulting in no further adjudication.
Single judge order closing a writ petition regarding restoration of electricity service connection. Counsel stated prior compliance, resulting in no further adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.18998 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05.04.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.18998 of 2016 and
W.M.P.No.16559 of 2016
C.Yesu Nesan
...Petitioner
-Vs-
(Deleted as per Court Order Dt:29.08.2018 by NKKJ in WMP.10965 of 2018)
1/4
W.P.No.18998 of 2016
Chennai
(R-6 is suo-moto impleaded as per Order Dated:07/06/2016 by N.K.K.,J in WP.No.18998 of 2016)
R7&8 Rep.by Their Power of attorney Agent, R.Thangasamy
(R7&8 are Substituted as LRs of Deceased R3.Rajeswari, Rep.by their power of Agent, R.Thangasamy
as per order dt.29.08.18 by NKKJ in WMP.10963/18 in WP.18998/16)
...Respondents
Prayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to restore the petitioner's electricity service connection No.441011-897 at premises bearing No.45, Pasumpon Nagar, Kalli Kuppam, Chennai-600 053.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.M.Pappiah for Mr.S.D.S.Phillip
For Respondents : (for R1 & R2) : Mr.L.Jai Venkatesh for TANGEDCO (for R6) : Mr.S.Ravichandran, AGP (for R4, R7 & R8) : Mr.P.Subba Reddy ( R3 ) : Deceased
2/4
W.P.No.18998 of 2016
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner made a submission that the
order passed by this Court has been complied with and thus, no further adjudication is required.
2.Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for
the petitioner, the writ petition stands closed as no further order is required.
No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.
(sha) Index : Yes Speaking Order Neutral Citation : Yes
05.04.2023
To
3/4
W.P.No.18998 of 2016
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM. J.,
(sha)
W.P.No.18998 of 2016
05.04.2023
4/4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
C.Yesu Nesan
Chairman Cum Managing Director, TANGEDCO
Assistant Engineer, TNEB
Mrs.Rajeshwari
Mrs.Sundari
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court