Allowed

M/s. D.P. Kaviyalakshmi v. The State Tax Officer

Madras HC10 Dec 2018WP/14093/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a writ petition seeking certiorari to set aside an assessment order. The court held that the order was flawed for not following procedures regarding mismatch issues established in JKM Graphics Case, remanding the matter for fresh assessment.

What did the court decide?

The impugned assessment order dated 23.04.2018 was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer to redo the assessment following the procedures and guidelines issued in JKM Graphics

M/s. D.P. Kaviyalakshmi Vs The State Tax Officer — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10.12.2018

¶2

CORAM

¶3

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU

¶4

Writ Petition No.14093 of 2018 and W.M.P.Nos.16665 & 16666 of 2018

¶5

M/s.D.P.Kaviyalakshmi Traders

¶6

rep.by its Proprietor -E.Ramanujam No.2/B, Arjuna mReddy Street, Sholingur-631 102 Wallajah Taluk, Vellore District. ...Petitioner

¶7

vs.

¶8

The State Tax Officer, Ranipet(Sipcot) Circle, Ranipet, Vellore District. ....Respondent

¶9

Writ Petition filed under section 226 of the constitution to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records on the file of the respondent in his impugned proceedings made in TIN 33934362834/2014-15 dated 23.04.2018 and quash the same as illegal and contrary to the scheme of the Act.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Hemalatha

¶11

For Respondents : Mr.V.Haribabu, Additional Government Pleader(T)

¶12

The petitioner is aggrieved against the order of assessment dated 23.04.2018 passed in respect of the assessment year 2014-15.

¶13

Heard both sides.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the only issue of mismatch dealt with by the Assessing Officer was not made by following the procedures/guidelines issued by this Court in JKM Graphics case, especially, when the present impugned order came to be passed after a long time from the date of the order passed in JKM Graphics case reported in 2017(19) VST 343. He further pointed out that the Assessing Officer has erred in not considering the turn over report to the tune of Rs.4,84,85,179/- in the monthly returns in Form-I while arriving

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

at the total sale turn over as per the web report.

¶17

On the other hand, the learned Additional Government Pleader submitted that even though the petitioner has reported the sales turn over to the tune of Rs.4,84,85,179/- has however, not paid the tax and therefore, the Assessing Officer has arrived at the total turn over and imposed the tax and penalty.

¶18

This Court, at this stage, is not expressing any view on the merits of the assessment, as this Court is convinced to set aside the order and remit the matter back to the Assessing Officer solely on the reason that the said assessment order seems to have been passed by not following the guidelines and directions issued in JKM Graphics Case. Therefore, it is for the Assessing Officer to consider the issue of mismatch once again and pass a fresh order of assessment by following the procedures/guidelines made in the above said case.

¶19

Accordingly, without expressing any view on the merits of the assessment, this Writ Petition is allowed and the impugned order is set aside. Consequently, the matter is remitted back to the Assessing Officer to redo the assessment following the procedures/guidelines issued in 2017(19) VST 343 JKM Graphics Solutions P.Ltd. v. C.T.O.(Mad) and pass orders within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition are closed.

¶20

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vsi To

¶21

The State Tax Officer, Ranipet(Sipcot) Circle, Ranipet, Vellore District.

¶22

+1cc to Mr.R.Hemalatha, Advocate, S.R.No.85203 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.85562

W.P.No.14093 of 2018

KJ(CO)

rrs 04/01/2019

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/s. D.P. Kaviyalakshmi v. The State Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. D.P. Kaviyalakshmi v. The State Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Jayagantha Vs The Secretary to Government

Mageswari Vs The Branch Manager

Gk Abdul Rehman Vs the State of Tamilnadu

Jayaraman Vs Varadarajan

R.Panneerselvam Vs The Director General of Income Tax (Investigation)/ Chief Commissioner of Income Tax

N.Ganesh Vs The District Collector