Disposed

Mageswari v. The Branch Manager

Madras HC7 Dec 2018WP/5512/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single judge of the Madras High Court disposed of a writ petition filed by a petitioner seeking a mandamus for an educational loan for her son. The court directed the petitioner to submit necessary documents within seven days for the bank to reconsider the application and grant the loan within two weeks. No costs awarded.

What did the court decide?

Directed the petitioner to approach the respondent bank with necessary documents within seven days. The bank was directed to consider and grant the education loan within two weeks thereafter.

Mageswari Vs The Branch Manager — Banking and Recovery | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 07.12.2018

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU

¶5

Writ Petition No.5512 of 2017

¶6

Mageswari ... Petitioner

¶7

vs. The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Keerapatty Branch, Harur,Dharmapuri District. ...Respondent

¶8

Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent Bank to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 29.12.2016 in accordance with law and direct the respondent to grant Educational loan to the petitioner's son Suriya who is now studying Ist year B.E.Mechanical at KPR Institute of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore. For Petitioner : Ms.M.Premikha for Mr.K.Nagarajan For Respondent : Ms.S.R.Sumathy, Standing counsel O R D E R

¶9

The petitioner seeks for a Mandamus directing the respondent Bank to consider her representation dated 29.12.2016, wherein and whereby, she sought for education loan to her son Suriya now studying in B.E.Mechanical Course at KPR Institute of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore.

¶10

2.The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent Bank is not considering the request for grant of educational loan. The respondent Bank filed a counter affidavit stating that the respondent Bank is ready and willing to consider the loan application of the petitioner as per the norms and rules as prescribed by Reserve Bank of India, provided the petitioner forward the application with ID proof and PAN card.

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

Though the counter is filed as stated supra, learned counsel for the respondent Bank submitted that the application filed by the petitioner already will be considered by the respondent Bank provided necessary documents are furnished by the petitioner before the respondent.

¶13

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the petitioner to approach the respondent Bank with necessary documents within a period of seven days from the date of receipt of a copy of this orders. On receipt of such document, the respondent Bank shall consider and grant education loan to the petitioner's son within a period of two weeks thereafter. No costs.

¶14

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar gsi/vsi To The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Keerapatty Branch, Harur,Dharmapuri District. +1cc to Mr.K.Nagarajan, Advocate, S.R.No.84722 +1cc to Ms.S.R.Sumathy, Advocate, S.R.No.84372 W.P. No.5512 of 2017 NA(CO) CS/09/01/2019

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Mageswari v. The Branch Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mageswari v. The Branch Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V. Ravikumar, Vs The Sub Registrar

T.Devi Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

M.Periyasamy Vs The Chairman cum Managing

S.Jayagantha Vs The Secretary to Government

Gk Abdul Rehman Vs the State of Tamilnadu

C.Amutha Vs The District Collector