A.Velusamy, v. The Assistant Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
In this non-appearing writ petition, the High Court dismissed the filed petition seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing excise authorities to act on a petitioner's representation, as no one appeared in support of the writ.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 23.01.2018
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MS. INDIRA BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
W.P.No.1349 of 2018
A.Velusamy .. Petitioner
Vs
1 The Assistant Commissioner of Excise
Tiruppur District, Tiruppur.
2 The District Manager
TASMAC, Tiruppur District, Tiruppur.
3 The Supervisor
TASMAC Shop No.1830
Chettipalayam Road
Palladam, Tiruppur District. .. Respondents
PRAYER: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing respondents 1 and 2 to take action against the 3rd respondent by considering the petitioner's representation dated 03.01.2018.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.T.N.Rajagopalan Government Pleader (incharge)for 1st respondent
Mr.K.Sathish Kumar for respondents 2 and 3
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A.Velusamy
- respondent
The Assistant Commissioner of Excise, Tiruppur District
- respondent
The District Manager, TASMAC, Tiruppur District
- respondent
The Supervisor, TASMAC Shop No.1830, Palladam
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court