PT dismissed as infructuous after respondent endorsed that the writ petition had become infructuous; connected MP also dismissed.
No relief granted as petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Dated : 19.7.2018
Coram :
The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM
Writ Petition No.7888 of 2012 & MP.No.1 of 2012
R.S.Senthil Kumar ...Petitioner
Vs
1.Tax Recovery Officer XXVIII, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai-34.
2.The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Business Circle, XV, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai-34. ...Respondents
PETITION under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the first respondent in his file T.R.No.1204/TRO XXVIII/2011-2012 and quash the impugned notice of attachment issued under Rule 48 to the Second schedule of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in Form No.ITCP No.16 dated 10.2.2012.
For Petitioner : Ms.A.Gnana Esthar for Mr.J.Balachandar For Respondents : Mr.J.Narayanaswamy, SSC ORDER
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as such. An endorsement has been made in the bundle today to that effect.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
WP.No.7888 of 2012 and MP.No.1 of 2012
CA(CO)
SMI/02.08.2018
R.S.Senthil Kumar
Tax Recovery Officer XXVIII
The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Business Circle, XV
T.S.SIVAGNANAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
