Petitioner challenged rejection of RTI appeal and non-disposal of second appeal before CCI. Benches granted liberty to pursue pending second appellate remedy before CCI without deciding merits.
Liberty granted to petitioner to pursue remedy before Second Appellate Authority; writ petition disposed off.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.02.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU
W.P. No.11956 of 2017
M.Dinesh
... Petitioner
Versus 1. Foreign Regional Registration Office represented by FRRO Chennai Bureau of Immigration No.26, Haddows Road, Shastri Bhavan Annexe Building, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034. 2. Ms.I.B.Rani Director and Appellate Authority, FRRO Delhi, Intelligence Bureau, Ministry of Home Affairs, Sector - I, East Block - 8, R.K.Puram, New Delhi - 110 066. 3. The Commissioner (Immigration), Bureau of Immigration, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, East Block - VIII, Level - V, Sector - 1, R.K.Puram, New Delhi - 110 066.
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order in the nature of writ calling for the records of the 2nd respondent reply letter No.I /IMM/2016 (A) 3619 New Delhi dated 20.12.2016 and quash the same and consequently direct the 2nd responden to furnish requested arrival and departure particulars under RTI Act, mentioned in the Passport No.H.4940685 to the petitioner from 01.01.2013 to 31.12.2015.
For Petitioner : Mr.B.Ullasavelan
For Respondents : Mr.Christopher Kishore Vincent
ORDER
The petitioner is aggrieved against the order passed by the 2nd respondent, dated 20.12.2016 rejecting the appeal filed by the petitioner under the RTI Act, as against the order passed by the first respondent.
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
vsi2/vri
To :
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petitioner ought to be stayed from filing writ petition challenging first appellate authority order when second appeal is pending before Central Information Commission.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M. Dinesh
Foreign Regional Registration Office represented by FRRO Chennai Bureau of Immigration
Ms. I.B.Rani Director and Appellate Authority, FRRO Delhi
The Commissioner (Immigration), Bureau of Immigration
K. Ravichandrababu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
