Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking quashing of a notice under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and adherence to Act 1 of 1976. The petition was withdrawn by counsel, leading to its dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02.02.2018 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P.No.2275 of 2018 and
WMP Nos.2773 to 2775 of 2018
R.Dakshinamurthy S/o.K.Ravikumar ... Petitioner
vs.
1.State Express Transport Corporation Tamil Nadu Limited, Rep.by its General Manager,
Thiruvalluvar House,
No.2, Pallavan Salai,
Chennai-600 002.
2.The Branch Manager, State Express Transport Corporation Tamil Nadu Ltd., Puducherry. ...Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records on the file of the 1st respondent relating to the impugned notice bearing No.20493/G1/SETC/2009, dated 24.10.2007 and quash the same and issue a direction to the 1st respondent to adhere to the procedure as set out in Act 1 of 1976.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Rajendrakumar
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Assistant Registrar(CS VII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
mk
To
The State Express Transport Corporation Tamil Nadu Limited, Thiruvalluvar House, No.2, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-600 002.
2.The Branch Manager, State Express Transport Corporation Tamil Nadu Ltd., Puducherry.
+1cc to Mr.S.Rajendra Kumar, Advocate SR.No.7843
NM(CO)
sm:15.2.2018
W.P.No.2275 of 2018
2 provisions across 2 enactments
R. Dakshinamurthy
State Express Transport Corporation Tamil Nadu Limited
K. Ravichandrabaabu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
