Disposed

A.Noble Arockiadas v. the District Collector

Madras HC11 Apr 2018WP/10536/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This petition sought to quash an order of suspension against the petitioner. The court held that the impugned suspension order had been revoked during the writ petition's pendency but directed the respondent authority to consider the petitioner's representation regarding unpaid subsistance allowance.

What did the court decide?

Directed the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation and pay the subsistance allowance if legally due.

A.Noble Arockiadas Vs the District Collector — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 11.04.2018

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN

¶6

W.P.No.10536 of 2011
A.Noble Arockiadas .. Petitioner
Vs.
1. The District Collector,
Erode District,
Erode.
2. The Assistant Director of Town Panchayath
Collectorate, Erode.
3. The Executive officer,
Kembanaiyackenpalayam Town Panchayath
Kembanaiyackenpalayam,
Sathyamangalam Taluk,
Erode District. .. Respondents

¶7

Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the order of suspension dated 22.09.2004 made in Roc.No.63090/2004/V2 issued by the first respondent herein, quash the same.

¶8

For Petitioner .. Mr.V.Anandhamoorthy

¶9

For Respondents .. Mr.J.Pothiraj, Spl. Govt. Pleader for R1 & R2 Mr.V.Balamuruganae for R3

¶10

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶11

¶12

ORDER

¶13

The petitioner has approached this Court, seeking the following

¶14

relief:-

¶15

“Writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the order of suspension dated 22.09.2004 made in Roc.No.63090/2004/V2 issued by the first respondent herein, quash the same.”

¶16

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that what is challenged in the writ petition has been revoked during the pendency of the writ petition. However, according to the petitioner, the subsistance allowance for the period of suspension has not been paid to the petitioner. In this connection, it appears that the petitioner made a representation. If any representation has been made in this regard to the second respondent/competenant authority, the second respondent/competent authority shall consider the same and pass orders and make payment if any, in accordance with law.

¶17

With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No

¶18

costs.

¶19

11.04.2018

¶20

Speaking Order/Non-speaking Order

¶21

Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No

¶22

http://www.judis.nic.in

kal

The District Collector, Erode District, Erode.

¶27

The Assistant Director of Town Panchayath Collectorate, Erode.

¶28

The Executive officer, Kembanaiyackenpalayam Town Panchayath Kembanaiyackenpalayam, Sathyamangalam Taluk, Erode District.

¶29

http://www.judis.nic.in

V.PARTHIBAN, J

kal

W.P.No.10536 of 2011
11.04.2018

¶34

http://www.judis.nic.in

A.Noble Arockiadas v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Noble Arockiadas v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Management of Vs the Presiding Officer

M. Senthikumar Vs the Secretary to Government

S.Selvaraj Vs the General Manager

K.R.Kumarasamy Vs the Accountant General

J.Chandrasekar, Vs the Superintendent of Police

D.Pandian, Vs the Joint Registrar of Co-Op.