In a writ petition under Article 226 seeking certiorari to quash orders passed by respondents, the High Court of Judicature at Madras held that due to subsequent developments, the petition became infructuous and was dismissed.
The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10.04.2018
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN
W.P.No.10755 of 2012 and M.P.No.2 of 2012
S.Selvaraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu Fisheries Development Corporation Limited, No.485, Nandanam, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 006. 2.The Manager, Production and Marketing, Tamil Nadu Fisheries Development Corporation Limited, Aliyar Post, Pollachi. 3.The Deputy Manager, Marketing, Tamil Nadu Fisheries Development Corporation Limited, Makkinampatti, Ganapathy Nagar, Pollachi Taluk. 4.P.Aruputharaj ... Respondents
Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of certiorari, to call for the entire records relating to the impugned order dated 04.04.2012 in Memo Ka.Mu.No.23/E/11-Pollachi passed by the 2nd respondent and consequential impugned order dated 11.04.2012 in Memo Na.Ka.No.Virpanai/2011-12 passed by the 3rd respondent and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.L.Mouli For Respondents: Mr.R.Nalliappan for R1 : Mr.S.Sathia Murthi for R2 : Mr.M.Kempraj for R3 : No appearance for R4
O R D E R
It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that in view of the subsequent development during the pendency of the writ petition , nothing survives for further consideration in this writ petition.
2. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
s/d-
Assistant Registrar(CS-III)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
gsk
To
1.The General Manager,
Tamil Nadu Fisheries Development
Corporation Limited,
No.485, Nandanam, Anna Salai,
Chennai 600 006.
2.The Manager,
Production and Marketing,
Tamil Nadu Fisheries Development
Corporation Limited,
Aliyar Post, Pollachi.
3.The Deputy Manager,
Marketing,
Tamil Nadu Fisheries Development
Corporation Limited,
Makkinampatti, Ganapathy Nagar,
Pollachi Taluk.
+1 CC to Mr.R.Nalliappan, advocate sr 26603.
W.P.No.10755 of 2012
GMI(CO)
SP(27/04/2018)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.Selvaraj
The General Manager, Tamil Nadu Fisheries Development Corporation Limited
The Manager, Production and Marketing, Tamil Nadu Fisheries Development Corporation Limited
The Deputy Manager, Marketing, Tamil Nadu Fisheries Development Corporation Limited
V.Parthiban
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
