Allowed

The Special Officer v. the Presiding Officer

Madras HC19 Mar 2018WMP(MD)/8512/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court allowed writ petitions seeking restoration of orders dismissed for default. The court granted relief on the condition that the petitioner pay Rs. 500 towards costs to the Legal Services Authority.

What did the court decide?

Petitions allowed conditionally; petitioner directed to pay Rs. 500 towards costs to the Legal Service Authority attached to the Bench.

The Special Officer Vs the Presiding Officer — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Special Original Jurisdiction )

¶2

Monday, the Nineteenth day of March Two Thousand Eighteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶5

WMP(MD) Nos.8512 and 8513 of 2016 IN WP(MD) Nos.854 and 853 of 2009

¶6

THE SPECIAL OFFICER A.2159 VADUGAMBADY PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, VEDASANDUR TALUK, DINDIGUL DISTRICT ... PETITIONER / PETITIONER IN BOTH THE PETITIONS Vs

¶7

1 THE PRESIDING OFFICER DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR, DINDIGUL

¶8

2 M.VELLAICHAMY ... RESPONDENTS / RESPONDENTS

¶9

IN BOTH THE PETITIONS

¶10

PRAYER IN WMP(MD)No.8512/16 IN WP(MD)No.854/09

¶11

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to restore the order of this Honble Court in WP(MD) No.854/2009 which was dismissed for default on 8.6.2016

¶12

Prayer in WMP(MD). 8513/ 2016 IN WP(MD)No.853/09 :

¶13

To restore the order of this Honble Court in WP(MD) No.853/2009 which was dismissed for default on 8.6.2016

¶14

ORDER : These petitions coming on for orders upon perusing the petitions and the affidavits filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.V.O.S.KALAISELVAM, Advocate for the petitioner in both the petitions and of the court made the following order:-

¶15

These petition case allowed on condition to pay a sum of Rs.500/-towards cost in each of the petition to the Legal Service Committed attached to this Bench on or before 23.03.18, failing which, this petition shall stand automatically vacated without further reference to this Court.

¶16

sd/19/03/2018 / TRUE COPY /

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶19

¶20

THE PRESIDING OFFICER DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR, DINDIGUL

¶21

COPY TO:-

¶22

THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, LEGAL AID SERVICES AUTHORITY, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶23

VSM

¶24

JAM/20/03/2018/ CSL-RR / SAR 4/ 2P- 3C

¶25

WMP(MD) Nos.8512 and 8513 of 2016 IN

¶26

WP(MD) Nos.854 and 853 of 2009

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The Special Officer v. the Presiding Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Special Officer v. the Presiding Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.R.Rengaraj @ a.R.R.Raju Vs Aranmanai Raman Chettiar

D. Dearaj Athisayaraj, Vs the Accountant General

Smt.Soundaravalli, Vs the Secretary

N. Kumar, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

K.Ramar, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu Rep.

S.M. Jeyalakshmi, Vs the Addl. Chief Secretary to