Allowed

The Chief Engineer, v. Thiru. S. Veeraperumal

Madras HC12 Oct 2018WMP(MD)/19426/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court allowed a writ miscellaneous petition seeking restoration of a writ petition (WP(MD) No.7483 of 2009) which had been dismissed for default due to non-payment of bounty. The court recalled the dismissal order and restored the main petition along with associated mercy petitions to the file, directing the registry to schedule a hearing.

What did the court decide?

The impugned order dated 16.02.2012 dismissing WP(MD) No.7483 of 2009 is recalled. The writ petition and related mercy petitions are restored to the file with an interim stay granted.

The Chief Engineer, Vs Thiru. S. Veeraperumal — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Special Original Jurisdiction )

¶3

Friday, the Twelfth day of October Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU

¶6

WMP(MD) No.19426 of 2018 IN WP(MD) No.7483 of 2009

¶7

1 THE CHIEF ENGINEER, TUTICORIN THERMAL POWER STATION, TUTICORIN -628004. 2 SUPERINTENDENTING ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SYSTEM, TUTICORIN THERMAL POWER STATION, TUTICORIN 3 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE, DIVISION-1, TUTCORIN THERMAL POWER STATION, TUTICORIN 4 THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, TUTCORIN THERMAL POWER STATION, INDUSTRIAL COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD, IND.NO.1742, TUTICORIN -628004

¶8

5 THE CHAIRMAN, TAMILNADU ELECTRICITY BOARD, 144, ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI -600002. ... PETITIONER/WRIT PETITIONER Vs

¶9

1 S.VEERAPERUMAL 2 THE PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, TIRUNELVELI. ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶10

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to setaside the impugned order dated 16.02.2012 passed in WP(MD)NO.7483 of 2009 dismissing the above writ petition for non-payment of batta and restore the same on the file of this Honble court.

¶11

Prayer in WP(MD). 7483/ 2009 :

¶12

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ or order or direction calling for the records of

¶13

¶14

the second respondent Labour Court relating to its award dated 20.12.2007 passed in I.D.No.35 of 2002 and quash the same as illegal and without jurisdiction and pass such further or other orders as this Honourable Court.

¶15

ORDER : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.P.MALINI, Advocate M/S.T.S.GOPALAN & CO, Advocate for the petitioner, the court made the following order:-

¶16

It is seen that W.P.(MD)No.7483 of 2009 was dismissed for default, as against the first respondent on 13.07.2010, for nonpayment of Batta and as against the second respondent on 16.02.2012, since the second respondent is only a formal party. Admittedly, W.P. (MD)No.7483 of 2009 was not dismissed on merits and considering the fact that every litigant wants his case to be decided on merits, this Court is inclined to allow the present Writ Miscellaneous Petition.

¶17

Accordingly, this writ miscellaneous petition is ordered and the order dated 16.02.2012 is recalled and W.P.(MD)No.7483 of 2009 along with M.P.(MD)Nos.1 of 2009 & 1 of 2011 are restored to file.

¶18

Registry is directed to post the writ petition for hearing on 08.11.2018. Learned Counsel for the petitioners is directed to take private notice to the respondents returnable by 08.11.2018. Till 08.11.2018, there shall be an order of interim stay in M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2009 in W.P.(MD)No.7483 of 2009.

¶19

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶20

¶21

THE PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, TIRUNELVELI.

¶22

WMP(MD) No.19426 of 2018

¶23

WP(MD) No.7483 of 2009

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

JM/PN/SAR 4/12.10.2018/2P/3C

The Chief Engineer, v. Thiru. S. Veeraperumal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Chief Engineer, v. Thiru. S. Veeraperumal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

I Jayanthi, Vs the Governement of

Tvl. Anuj Trade Link Co., Vs the Assistant Commissioner(St)

M/S.Supreme Agencies Vs the Deputy Commercial Tax

G.Murugesan, S/O. Gopal, Vs the Regional Transport Officer

G.Senthil Kumar, Vs the Regional Transport Officer

M. Palanichamy, Vs the Special Deputy