The Commissioner v. v.Mahadevan
Case brief
What is this about?
Motion by Municipal Collector to vacate interim stay orders dismissed by a single judge who heard the matter without the petitioner or government representing any party.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Special Original Jurisdiction )
Friday, the Eighth day of June Two Thousand Eighteen
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
WMP Nos.6612 & 6613 of 2018
in WP Nos.30298 & 30299 of 2017
THE COMMISSIONER [ PETITIONER IN BOTH THE PETITIONS] KADAYANALLUR MUNICIPALITY, KADAYANALLUR, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT
Vs
1 V.MAHADEVAN, [ 1ST RESPONDENT IN WMP.6612/2018]
2 THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU [ 2 & 3 RESPONDENTS IN BOTH THE REP BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PETITIONS ] MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & WATER SUPPLY DEPARTMENT, FORT ST. GEORGE, SECRETARIAT,CHENNAI-09
3 THE DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, CHEPAUK, CHENNAI-5
Parties & counsel
- applicant
THE COMMISSIONER [ PETITIONER IN BOTH THE PETITIONS] KADAYANALLUR MUNICIPALITY
- respondent
V.MAHADEVAN
- respondent
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU
- respondent
THE DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court