Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

V.Mahadevan, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2018)

Home
Madras HC
2018
V.Mahadevan, Vs The State of Tamil NaduV.Mahadevan, v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Disposed

V.Mahadevan, v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC8 Jun 2018WMP/33029/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Orders that the interim stay in two linked writ petitions is made absolute and that the petitions be listed for final disposal after four weeks.

What did the court decide?

The interim stay granted on 24.11.2017 is made absolute.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Special Original Jurisdiction )

Friday, the Eighth day of June Two Thousand Eighteen

PRESENT

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

WMP Nos.33029 & 33031 of 2017

in WP Nos.30298 & 30299 of 2017

V.MAHADEVAN, [ PETITIONER IN WMP.33029/2017 ]

P.PANDARAM, [ PETITIONER IN WMP.33031/2017 ]

Vs

1 THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU [ RESPONDENTS IN BOTH THE REP BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PETITIONS ] MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & WATER SUPPLY DEPARTMENT, FORT ST. GEORGE, CHENNAI-09

2 THE DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, CHEPAUK, CHENNAI-5

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
V.MAHADEVAN
petitioner
P.PANDARAM
respondent
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU
respondent
THE DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION
respondent
THE COMMISSIONER KADAYANALLUR MUNICIPALITY

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 8 Jun 2018 · June
Registered: 22 Nov 2017
Case no.: WMP/33029/2017

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from S.m. Subramaniam

Senthilkumar Vs The Govt. of Tamilnadu
7 Jun 2018
Arunagiri Vs The Govt. of Tamilnadu
7 Jun 2018
Johnsis Fransis Vs The Govt. of Tamilnadu
7 Jun 2018
The Commissioner Vs v.Mahadevan
8 Jun 2018
M/s.Delphi-Tvs Diesel Systems Vs Ito (Osd)/ Secretary

Cite this judgement

V.Mahadevan, v. The State of Tamil Nadu, WMP/33029/2017 (MAD), decided on 8 June 2018.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

Parties & counsel

Outcome

The interim stay granted on 24.11.2017 is made absolute.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Upon receiving WMP Nos.33029 & 33031 of 2017, the Court makes the interim stay already granted on 24.11.2017 absolute. The Court directs that the writ petitions for final disposal be fixed after four weeks. No substantive decision on the merits or recovery orders is delivered in this order.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

3 THE COMMISSIONER KADAYANALLUR MUNICIPALITY, KADAYANALLUR, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT

Petitions praying that in these circumstances stated therein and in the respective affidavits filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to

(1)stay the operation of the impugned letter issued by the 2nd respondent in proceedings Rc.Lr. No.45529/ F3/ 2010 dated 21.05.2015 and the consequential impugned order of refixation and recovery issued by the 3rd respondent in proceeding Na.Ka. No.3636/ 2017/ C1 dated 03.10.2017 (in WMP.33029/2017) and

(2)stay the operation of the impugned letter issued by the 2nd respondent in proceedings Rc.Lr. No.45529/ F3/ 2010 dated 21.05.2015 and the consequential impugned order of refixation and recovery issued by the 3rd respondent in proceeding Na.Ka. No.3635/ 2017/ C1 dated 03.10.2017 (in WMP.33031/2017)respectively pending WP.Nos.30298 & 30299 of 2017.

Order :These petitions coming on for orders upon perusing the petitions and the respective affidavits filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.R.PREM NARAYAN,

Advocate for the petitioner in each of the petitions and of MRS.A.SRIJAYANTHI SPL.GOVT.PLEADER on behalf of the Respondents 1 & 2 in both the petitions and of the 3^rd respondent not appearing either in person or by an Advocate the court made the following order:-

The interim stay already granted by this Court on 24.11.2017 is made absolute. Post the writ petitions “for final disposal” after four weeks.

-sd/-

08/06/2018

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub Assistant Registrar ( Statistics / C.S. ) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO

1 THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT OF TAMILNADU, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & WATER SUPPLY DEPARTMENT, FORT ST. GEORGE, CHENNAI-09

2 THE DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, CHEPAUK, CHENNAI-5

3 THE COMMISSIONER KADAYANALLUR MUNICIPALITY, KADAYANALLUR, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT

C.C. to M/S.R.PREM NARAYAN Advocate SR.NO. 6591

Order

in WMP.33029 & 33031/2017 in WP.30298 & 30299/2017

Date :08/06/2018

From 26.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Interim Orders in this format VS 13.06.2018

Coram

AI extract

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

CNR

HCMA010531652017

Topic

Writ and Judicial Review

Bench

S.m. Subramaniam

Disposal

STAY MADE ABSOLUTE

8 Jun 2018

M.Thanigai Malai, Vs The Secretary to Government

11 Jun 2018