Dismissed

S.Rajendran, v. the Spl. Officer

Madras HC7 Jun 2018WA/1374/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed an appeal against an order in a writ petition where the underlying matter was finally resolved via an appeal under the Shops and Establishment Act regarding termination of service. The appeal was held infructuous as no relief survived for adjudication.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to approach the respondent for subsistence allowance consideration within six weeks.

S.Rajendran, Vs the Spl. Officer — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 07.06.2018

¶3

Coram

¶4

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M.SUNDRESH

¶5

and

¶6

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶7

and M.P.No.1 of 2010

¶8

S.Rajendran .. Appellant

¶9

¶10

The Special Officer, Thirupalakudi Primary Agricultural Co-operative Bank Ltd.,

¶11

Thirupalakudi P.O.,

¶12

Mannargudi Taluk, Thiruvarur District. .. Respondent

¶13

Appeal preferred under Clause XV of Letters Patent against the order dated 28.06.2010 made in W.P.No.24643 of 2008.

¶14

W.P.No.24643 of 2008:

¶15

This Writ Petition has been preferred under Article 226 of the constitution of India,praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records from the respondent relating to the impugned order dt 10.9.2008 and quash the same and to direct the respondent to revoke the suspension of the petitioner

¶16

JUDGMENT

¶17

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.)

¶18

This writ appeal is directed against the order dated 28.06.2010 made in W.P.No.24643 of 2008, whereby the learned single Judge declined to grant the relief sought for by the appellant herein.

¶19

2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.S.Ayyathurai, learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that subsequent to the order passed, certain developments have taken place. The final order passed by the respondent terminating the service of the appellant was put into challenge before the

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

Appellate Authority under the Shops and Establishment Act. The above appeal was allowed and the said order has become final.

¶22

3.In such view of the matter, nothing survives for adjudication in this appeal. Accordingly, the writ appeal stands dismissed as infructuous. However, insofar as subsistence allowance during the pendency of the proceedings is concerned, liberty is given to the appellant to approach the respondent. As and when such request is made, the same shall be considered by the respondent within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the said request. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶23

s/d-
Assistant Registrar(CS VII)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
mmi
+1 CC to Mr.S.Ayyathurai, Advocate sr 35425.
W.A.No.1374 of 2010
BS(CO)
SP(21/06/2018)

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Rajendran, v. the Spl. Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Rajendran, v. the Spl. Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chevalier T. Thomas Vs M/S. Union Carbide Employees

Dr.B.R.Shankar, Vs B.R.Srinivasa Rao

T. Ashok Surana Vs T. Suresh Surana

K. Shivakumar Vs Murugesan

K.Rajasekar, Vs the Chairman

R 719 Valasiramani Primary Vs Presiding Officer