Dr.B.R.Shankar, v. B.R.Srinivasa Rao
Case brief
What is this about?
The court disposed of two Civil Miscellaneous Petitions and one Original Side Appeal. Upon agreement by counsel for final disposal of main appeals, the interim injunction restraining alienation was made absolute. The petitions were closed with no substantive decision on the merits.
What did the court decide?
The status quo interim injunction was made absolute; the petitions were closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Sixth day of June Two Thousand Eighteen
PRESENT
THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH
AND
THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
CMP NO.6386 OF 2018
IN OSA.99 OF 2018
1 DR.B.R.SHANKAR [PETITIONER IN BOTH THE PETITIONS ]
2 B.R LAKSHMI
3 MRS.B.J.CHRISTIANASHEELA
4 USHA SHREE BHAKTAVA RAJAIAH
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dr. B.R. Shankar
- petitioner
B.R. Lakshmi
- petitioner
Mrs. B.J. Christianasheela
- petitioner
Usha Shree Bhakta Rajaiah
- respondent
B.R. Srinivasa Rao
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court