Allowed

P.Ganesh@Venkatasubramanian v. M.Aruna

Madras HC17 Dec 2018TR CMP/842/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single judge allowed the transfer petition, ordering the withdrawal of H.M.OP.No.218 of 2018 from Family Court, Trichy and its transfer to Family Court, Chennai, following an endorsement of consent by the respondent.

What did the court decide?

Petition allowed; Transfer of H.M.OP.No.218 of 2018 from Family Court, Trichy to Family Court, Chennai with transmission of records within two weeks.

P.Ganesh@Venkatasubramanian Vs M.Aruna — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 17.12.2018

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN

¶5

TR.C.M.P.No.842 of 2018

¶6

& CMP.No.20866 of 2018

¶7

P.Ganesh @ Venkatasubramanian .. Petitioner

¶8

Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 CPC to withdraw H.M.OP.No.218 of 2018 pending on the file of Family Court, Trichy and transfer the same to the file of Family Court, Chennai.

¶9

For petitioner : Mr.P.Kandasamy for Mr.R.Govindaraj

¶10

For respondent : M/s.Gemma Hepsi Beulah for

¶11

Mr.J.Saravana Vel

¶12

This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking the relief to withdraw H.M.OP.No.218 of 2018 now pending on the file of Family Court, Trichy and transfer the same to the file of Family Court, Chennai.

¶13

Heard, Mr.P.Kandasamy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and M/s.Gemma Hepsi Beulah, learned counsel, who takes notice on behalf of the respondent.

¶14

Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel appearing for the respondent made an endorsement that she has no objection to allow this petition and for transferring the case in H.M.OP.No.218 of 2018 from the file of Family Court, Trichy to the file of Family Court, Chennai. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the respondent, this petition is allowed.

¶15

Accordingly, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. The petition in H.M.OP.No.218 of 2018 is ordered to be withdrawn from the file of the Family Court, Trichy and transferred to the file of the Family Court, Chennai, The

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

learned Judge, Family Court, Trichy is directed to transmit all the records pertaining to H.M.OP.No.218 of 2018 to the file of the Family Court, Chennai within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of records, the learned Judge, Family Court, Chennai is directed to dispose of the case as expeditiously as possible. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶18

Sd/-
Deputy Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
dn
To
The learned Judge, Family Court, Trichy
The learned Judge, Family Court, Chennai
+1cc to Mr.J.Saravana Vel, Advocate, S.R.No.88044
+1cc to Mr.R.Govindraj, Advocate, S.R.No. 88128
Tr.C.M.P.No.842 of 2018
GN(09/01/2019)

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.Ganesh@Venkatasubramanian v. M.Aruna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Ganesh@Venkatasubramanian v. M.Aruna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Velu Vs S.Ravi

A. Kannan Vs Mr Pazhani

D.Lakshmi Priya Vs Rajeswaran Ganesan

L.Karthika Vs M.Manoj Kumar

T.Deepika Alias Aruna Vs N.Balaji S/O Nethaji

Pavithra @ Sonia Vs Saravanan