R. Ayyasamy v. M Shanmugham
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant sought permission to withdraw the Second Appeal under Section 100 CPC. With the court's permission and an endorsement by counsel, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn without ordering costs.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed as withdrawn without order as to costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 14-11-2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Second Appeal No.847 of 2006
R.Ayyasamy .. Appellant/Appellant/Plaintiff
..Vs..
1.M.Shanmugham
2.M.Marthamuthu
3.M.Kittusamy
4.M.Sivasamy
5.Mrs.M.Deivathel
6.Mrs.M.Chinnakkal .. Respondents/Respondents/Defendants
Prayer:-
Second Appeal is preferred under Section 100 of the
Code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree passed
in A.S.No.151 of 2005 on the file of the Sub Court, Coimbatore
dated 29.11.2005 confirming the judgment and decree in
O.S.No.2750 of 2000 dated 2.3.2005 on the file of the I
Additional District Munsif Court, Coimbatore.
For Appellant : Mr.M.Velmurugan
For Respondents : Mr.A.Sivaji
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the appellant sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Second Appeal and he has also made an endorsement to the said effect.
- In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the appellant, the Second Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
Sd/Assistant Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
R. Ayyasamy
- respondent
1. M. Shanmugham
- respondent
2. M. Marthamuthu
- respondent
3. M. Kittusamy
- respondent
4. M. Sivasamy
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court