Ambika v. Sethuraman
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED…
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :14.11.2018
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
S.A.No.1376 of 2005
C.M.P.No.18193 of 2005
- Ambika
2. Senthil Kumar
3. Shankar
4. Shanthanalakshmi
5. Thaiyalnayagi
6. Selvi .. Appellants
vs
1. Sethuraman
2. Viswanathan .. Respondents
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of
Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree of
Principal Sub Court, Nagapattinam, dated 07.03.2005 made in
A.S.No.91 of 2004 confirming judgment and decree of District
Munsif Court, Nagapttinam dated 11.02.3004 made is O.S.No.169 of
1999.
For Appellant : Mr. S.Soundhar
For Respondents : Mr.L.Raja Sekar
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellant filed the memo stating that the issues between the parties to the lis had been settled out of Court. In view of the settlement, no further adjudication is required in respect of the grounds raised in the present second application.
- Accordingly, the second appeal stands closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ambika
- appellant
Senthil Kumar
- appellant
Shankar
- appellant
Shanthanalakshmi
- appellant
Thaiyalnayagi
- appellant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court