Kamalam v. Muruganraj
Case brief
What is this about?
The court allowed a second appeal, restoring the judgment and decree of the first instance court and setting aside the lower appellate court's decree, while awarding costs to the appellant.
What did the court decide?
The judgment and decree of the Subordinate Court dated 19.01.2015 are set aside; the judgment and decree of the First Instance Court dated 05.07.2011 are restored. Costs of Rs.1054/- awarded to appell
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
THURSDAY ELEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHTEEN
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN
S.A.No.504 of 2015
Kamalam
... Appellant/3rd Respondent
Vs.
1.Muruganraj
2.Pitchamuthu
3.Gomathi
4.Priya ... Respondents/Plaintiff/ Respondent 1,2,4
Appeal the decree of the Court of of the Sub Court, Namakkal in A.S.No.58 of 2011 dt.19.01.2015 Preferred against the decree of the court of the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Paramathy in O.S.No.156 of 2007 dated 05.07.2011 .
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kamalam
- respondent
Muruganraj
Coram
T. Ravindran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court