C. Shanmugham v. Easwaramoorthy
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras dismissed a second appeal filed under Section 100 of the CPC on the grounds of non-prosecution by the appellant who failed to instruct counsel.
What did the court decide?
The second appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:06.02.2018 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
S.A.No.435 of 1994
C.Shanmugam
... Appellant/Plaintiff
Vs.
- Eswaramoorthy
2. Nalini
3. Thara
4. Kunjammal
5. Lakshmi
6. Ashok kumar
7. Prabhu
8. Senthilkumar
9. Minor Valarmathi
10. Rani Venkatachalapathi ... Respondents/Defendants
Prayer:
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. against the Judgment and decree dated 30.09.1992 and made in A.S.No.39 of 1992 on the file of the Learned District Judge, Salem, Partly confirming the Judgment and decree dated 31.01.1992 and made in O.S.No.683 of 1983 on the file of the Learned District Munsif, Salem.
For Appellant : M/s.G.Jeremiah
For R2 & R4 : Mr.Arul for R2 & R4. R5,R7 to R9 Mr.T.R.Rajaraman
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal should be allowed on merits.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
S. Shanmugam
- respondent
Eswaramoorthy
- respondent
Nalini
- respondent
Thara
- respondent
Kunjammal
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · M.dhandapani
- Order 2 · R.sakthivel
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court