Gandhimathiammal v. Kannan
Case brief
What is this about?
The Second Appeal under Section 100 CPC was dismissed as the matter was settled out of court between the parties in 2012, leaving nothing for adjudication.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed as settled out of court. No Costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 06.02.2018 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
S.A.No.2096 of 2002
Gandhimathiammal
Vs.
Kannan ... Respondent Subramania Pillai (died during the pendency of the Appeal and the respondent herein
is impleaded as Legal heir as per the order of the Lower Court in I.A.No. 18/2002, dated 30.04.2002)
Prayer:
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.52/2000, dated 20.09.2002 on the file of Additional Sub-Judge(Incharge), Myladuthurai confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.537 of 1991 dated 22.03.2000, on the file of Additional District Munsif, Myladuthurai.
For Appellant : Mr.V.Kathiravan For Respondent : Mr.R.Shivakumar J U D G M E N T
For Respondent : Mr.R.Shivakumar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Gandhimathiammal
- respondent
Kannan/Subramania Pillai
Coram
M. Dhandapani
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court